Most Important Facts:
Gideon, the defendant, was convicted and charged with a felony for breaking into a poolroom with the intent to commit a misdemeanor. Gideon was unable to afford proper counsel and the State Court of Florida denied appointing him council due to his crime not being a …show more content…
Wainwright to argue the legality of not granting a defendant proper council. These cases look into the 14th and 6th amendment. The Powell v. Alabama (1932) was a case where upholding the right to a council represented a fair trial. Four years later, Grosjean v. American Press Co (1936) concluded that, “[The assistance of counsel] is one of the safeguards of the Sixth Amendment deemed necessary to insure fundamental human rights of life and liberty.” (p.3). While, on the other hand, Betts v. Brady (1942) argued this fact and claimed that the 6th amendments guarantee of counsel is not a fundamental right too a indigent defendant. This was a major case in determining the outcome of this case. Then, Three years prior to this case, Kinsella v. United States ex rel. Singleton (1960) “rejected any constitutional distinction between capital and noncapital offenses,” in regards to civilian dependent of armed forces personnel. This is a major case, as the reason for Gideon not initially receiving council has to do with his case being