On the other hand, the negative to this creation is that public defenders normally have bigger case loads with not as much experience and time as a private attorney (S.L. Law, 2022). This could lead to public defenders not making each case a priority. With this, the public defender’s office could be seen as a positive and also a negative development, depending on how one perceives it. In my opinion, however, I think that it was a positive development. Additionally, I firmly believe that the decision in the Gideon v Wainwright case was a benefit to all, especially to those that cannot afford their own. The impact of this case demonstrated the importance of verifying that future cases did not disrupt one’s constitutional rights. In other words, the decision of the case allowed for other cases to confirm that the accused has been given a completely fair trial. The case, Massiah v United States, presents a similar question regarding the Sixth Amendment. The case presented the question of whether a ‘defendant's incriminating statements made without the presence of counsel after a criminal proceeding has begun are admissible as evidence’ (Oyez, accessed