Govt: Prison and Great Arguments Essay examples

Submitted By adammichael
Words: 956
Pages: 4
Open Document
Adam Douville
American Government
Mr. O’Connor
12/18/12
Death Penalty The question of whether or not the death penalty should be legal or not is a huge controversial topic in which many states are not on the same side. As of now the U.S. has thirty three states that allow the death penalty including the U.S. Government and the U.S. Military. The topic includes such great arguments to whether or not it should be allowed or not but I personally believe that it should be legal. From whether or not this violates our “Cruel and unusual” clause in the Bill of Rights is pushed to the limit because no-supporters believe that the Government shouldn’t be able to take a civilians life. But on the other hand some would argue that there should be a justice served in which the killers are killed in return. Those who support the death penalty argue that letting a criminal sit in prison knowing the fact that he is still alive after what he has done is wrong. The death penalty allows some closure for the family that has lost a loved one, and might help them coop with their lose better than knowing the killer is still alive. And although sitting in prison is an awful life to live for the rest of your life, I’m sure any killer would rather sit in jail than die by execution. That’s where the death penalty shows a form of crime deterrent by scaring people into knowing if they do something so wrong that they might get put to death for it. But not only is this true for people who haven’t yet committed a serious enough crime to get the death penalty, It also has a lot to do with the inmates that are already in prison. If there is no death penalty what is going to stop someone who already has a life sentence from killing others while incarcerated? It’s a tough situation for sure because you can’t extend a prisoners sentence if it is already a life sentence. In today’s justice system there really is no known sentence for a prisoner, I don’t understand how our courts give people life sentences and “+20+ years either, nothing is going to truly stop a prisoner with that situation from killing again. And not only should other inmates be afraid of that possibility, but also the chances of them escaping and killing civilians again. We can also face the facts that our prisons around the country are way to over-populated as it is. Supporters of the death penalty also believe that by carrying out on these executions will lessen the amount of overflow we have in our state penitentiaries by also giving justice to the victims families in the process. On the other hand we have those who argue that the death penalty should not be allowed to anyone in any circumstance. The phrase “An eye for an eye” goes hand in hand in this situation, but for these people who think that’s totally not right they have their own reasons to believe differently. In History the government has been known for making their own rules, clearly, but they always stress how wrong murdering people is and how it needs to be stopped. But how does that make any sense, because the Government is actually taking the lives of those who are on death row. So they’re basically going against what they have always told us is wrong, and that’s a huge topic that arguers of the death penalty discuss. There are so many other
Show More

Related Documents: Govt: Prison and Great Arguments Essay examples

Essay about Britain in the War

AJP Taylor – Origins of the Second World War Second Thoughts - Austrian crisis was launched by Schusnigg, not Hitler - Britain took the lead role in dismembering Czechoslovakia, not Hitler - Two views of Hiter; 1) He wanted a great war for its own sake 2) He was a more rational and constructive figure; he had a coherent long term plan of an original nature which he pursued with unwavering resistance - AJP Taylor maintains the view that Hitler had no long term…

Words 4999 - Pages 20

APOL 104 Week 2 Essay

on: Tuesday, March 24, 2015 7:58:40 AM EDT Congratulations to all of you for the completion of the first week of class. So far, you all did an excellent job completing the CRC and Contact Information quizzes on time. I pray that all of you had a great experience. All assignments for Week #2 are due next Monday, March 30, 2015 by 11:59pm EST.
 Here is what you should expect from Week #2: Text Reading:
 
 

 Weider & Gutierrez, Chapters 2 - 3
 
 

 Caner & Hindson (PEA): Logical Fallacies/…

Words 7772 - Pages 32

Principles Of The Australian Parliamentary System

parliamentary system. It ensures that there is a government made up of representatives who are chosen by the people. In order to ensure a representative government exists, regular elections are held e.g. elections for H/Reps are every 3 years. If a govt. is no longer representative, it will not be re-elected come on the next election (it will be voted out of office). The structure of parliament also relates to this principle; the Lower House represents the wishes of the majority of people when legislating…

Words 6752 - Pages 28

Gp Essay Mainpoints

GP NOTES 2010 (ESSAY) Content Page 1. Media a. New vs. Traditional b. New: narcissistic? c. Government Censorship d. Profit-driven Media e. Advertising f. Private life of public figures g. Celebrity as a role model h. Blame media for our problems i. Power + Responsibility of Media j. Media ethics k. New Media and Democracy 2. Science/Tech a. Science and Ethics b. Government and scientist role in science c. Rely too much on technology? d. Nuclear technology…

Words 24667 - Pages 99