My most notable impression is seeing the drastic revolution in informed consent that Lacks’ story helped to trigger. While undergoing treatment, she was never explicitly informed about the collection and use of her cells for research purposes. This lack of transparency voided the opportunity for Lacks to make informed decisions about her samples. Furthermore, Hopkins also drew blood from her children claiming it was for screening purposes, only for it to be revealed that it was being used for research without their knowledge. Seeing the profits made by the labs and the consistent dishonesty of scientists prompted an important and major change in research ethics. The relationship between a patient and a doctor is typically one of trust. However, the doctors completely abused this trust by making decisions without obtaining consent. Another example of this violation of trust was Chester Southam, who injected HeLa cells into prisoner cancer patients. Although they voluntarily agreed, they were told it was for an “immune system test”. This was a blatant lie from Southam, which the prisoner believed under the assumption of a truthful