Henrietta Lacks Argumentative Essay.
When doctors enter the doctoring world, they swear to the Hippocratic Oath which states that they will “respect the privacy of my patients, for their problems are not disclosed to me that the world may know.” Lasagna, Louis. However, Howard Jones and George Gey broke the Hippocratic Oath when working with Henrietta Lacks. In this essay, I will be discussing what George Gey and Howard Jones did wrong and what they should have done instead. But first I will describe the story of Henrietta Lacks. Henrietta Lacks was a patient who went to John Hopkins Hospital, which was a hospital that would treat African American patients in the 1950s when they could not go anywhere else, due to worries of her having cervical cancer. There she finds out she does have cervical cancer from Dr. George Gey. He then took a sample of her cancerous tumor without her consent or knowledge. He sends these cells to a lab for …show more content…
This is shown in the book when the author says “I’ve tried to imagine how she’d feel knowing that her cells went up in the first space missions to see what would happen to human cells in zero gravity, or that they helped with some of the most important advances in medicine: the polio vaccine, chemotherapy, cloning, gene mapping, and in vitro fertilization.” Skloot, Rebecca. 1. What is the difference between a. and a. But this does not make what Dr. Jones and Dr. Gey did okay. The doctors never knew that her cells would be special. If they had never removed them from her body without her consent and never sent them to be researched, the cure would’ve never been found. Meaning that even if it did save millions, just know those breakthroughs were only possible because doctors broke their