Hobbes: Political Philosophy and Sovereign Essay

Submitted By wrightcm01
Words: 1609
Pages: 7
Open Document
What does absolute sovereignty mean for Hobbes and why does he think it necessary?
Thomas Hobbes, an English philosopher, felt that society naturally resembles a State of Nature, and that this State of Nature is a State of War. A State of Nature is “the condition where we are forced into contact with each other in the absence of a superior authority”. In order to avoid living in a State of Nature, and therefore avoiding a State of War, a sovereign had to be erected; the sovereign would be given the rights of all their subjects and be able to enforce peace. Hobbes thought that an absolute sovereign was such a sovereign with unlimited power; if the power was limited it would have to be limited by an even greater power. He also outlined a series of duties, and rights that were forfeited to the sovereign. Hobbes’ main argument for a sovereign was that any type of government is better than the State of Nature; that absolute sovereignty is the form of government most likely to be able to avoid a return to the State of Nature; and that “people can only live in peace if they are subjected to an absolute sovereign”.
The sovereign acquires their power through the cessation of rights by their subjects in order to achieve peace. The extent of this forfeiture would be to such a level that it is acceptable to everyone else that you have this amount of rights, as it is acceptable to you that another person has a certain amount of rights. If every person gives up their personal rights, then the power obtained must be invested in the hands of a select few; or preferably, according to Hobbes, in the hands of a single person. The cessation of rights by the whole of a society results in the creation of a commonwealth or of a Leviathan, a mortal god, “to which our peace and defense is owed”.
Once the sovereign has received the rights of every individual, they will have accumulated enough power and authority to carry out the wishes of the population as a whole. A covenant has been created between the sovereign and their subjects, in whom the people have invested their rights in the sovereign, and in return they would receive security from one another, as well as from foreign nations. However the sovereign does not actually have to engage in a contract or covenant with their subjects because the sovereign is not ceding power to anyone; but the people have to engage in covenants with each other so they will all cede rights to the sovereign.
Injustice, according to Hobbes, occurs when a person fails to complete their part of a covenant. Because a sovereign does not participate in any covenants with their subjects, it is impossible for a sovereign to commit injustice, which gives their subjects no right to rise against the sovereign. The only exception to this is if the sovereign commands their subjects to kill themselves; then self-preservation – the most important human desire – would override the orders of the sovereign and the subjects would have the right to rebel. Absolute sovereignty is the right not to be attacked by one’s subjects, while it is also the obligation that the sovereign will not demand that their subjects kill themselves.
There are practical reasons for the sovereign not participating in contracts with their subjects. Firstly, it is not practical for the sovereign to make a covenant with everyone individually, and it is not possible to make a covenant with the population as a whole because while the sovereign is being created, the people are still in a State of Nature and do not trust each other. A person who forfeited their rights to the sovereign has made a covenant with the rest of society, a covenant that can be reinforced by the sovereign through the sovereign’s ability to punish those who act unjustly. Therefore it can be seen as the fault of the perpetrator, who has been punished, if they are killed or injured by the sovereign. It is the role of the sovereign to punish those who have acted unjustly; but also the
Show More

Related Documents: Hobbes: Political Philosophy and Sovereign Essay

History Paper Thomas Hobbes

Adesola Bilesanmi Saginaw Valley State University History 100 Philosopher: Thomas Hobbes Thomas Hobbes was not born to power or wealth or influence, he was known as the son of a disgraced village vicar. Hobbes was lucky that his uncle was wealthy enough to provide for his education and that his intellectual talents were soon recognized and developed. Those intellectual abilities, and his uncle’s support, brought him a place in university of Oxford. And these in turn – together with a good deal…

Words 777 - Pages 4

Hobbes Levihatan Essay

Arellanes 04/03/13 PHIL 2306 Essay # 4 Thomas Hobbes I have to say that throughout this quarter this class was by far the most intellectually stimulating, mentally challenging, and had the heaviest reading load of all my classes. However, out of all the books, the speeches, the excerpts, and historical pieces and documents we have read, one reading in particular comes to mind when I’m asked which one will stay with me the longest. Thomas Hobbes’ Leviathan will probably be the single reading…

Words 850 - Pages 4

Crime Prevention Essay

influential philosopher, Locke’s writings would have a significant impact on western culture and philosophy. John Locke was born in the village of Wrington Somerset in England and attended the Westminster School, Christ Church, and studied medicine at the University of Oxford. His education and experiences at Oxford would play a significant role in his life as well as his teachings in epistemology, political philosophy, and education as cited by Bookman (1994). Locke' wrote the Two Treatises of Government…

Words 1750 - Pages 7

Governmental Philsophies: Locke vs. Hobbes Essay

A. Thomas Hobbes 1. Hobbes believed that people were naturally selfish, unsociable human beings. Human beings in general were simple minded, with selfish desires, and were most influenced by their desire for power over others. Hobbes believed that man were addicted to having power, and quarrel amongst people is only natural. Men also live by a “social contract” in which they treat others the way they wish to be treated themselves. Yet this social contract is not substantial enough to maintain order…

Words 819 - Pages 4

The Connection Between The Enlightenment And Thomas Hobbes

from the contemporary Renaissance world-view, which based its approach on the ideas of Aristotle and subsequent medieval philosophical and theological thinkers.1 It's methodology employed empiricism, logic, mathematics, reason, and the Mechanical Philosophy of cause and effect to explain the physical world, as opposed to the reliance on unreliable sensory knowledge and religious revelation which had dominated earlier thinking.2 As shall be shown, this empirical methodology was extremely influential…

Words 1288 - Pages 6

Thomas Hobbes And John Locke

theories of Hobbes and Locke, I disagree with Locke’s assertion that “In the state of nature men mostly kept their promises and honored their obligations, and, though insecure, it was mostly peaceful, good, and pleasant”. Human nature pre- inspired egocentric and corruption. Human being is most likely to do thing that is in his interest. It is very rare for human being to do thing out of altruistic, therefore promises have no substance in the state of nature. On the other hand Hobbes summed it well…

Words 393 - Pages 2

John Locke Vs Hobbes

Philosophy. What is it? What purpose does it serve in society? Although there may be a plethora of answers to these ambiguous questions, most individuals would agree that it is the investigation of the nature, causes or principles of reality, values or knowledge rooted in a reasoning approach. Moreover, philosophers provide inside into the mysteries of human existence and truth. Two well-known philosophers, John Locke and Thomas Hobbes, do exactly this by discussing elements of the social contract…

Words 1803 - Pages 8

Compare And Contrast Locke And Hobbes

by Triana M francis Looking at the thoughts of Hobbes and Locke we see a few similarities, but they did not really think much alike. In finding differences they seem far more common than similar ideas. By comparing and contrasting it easily be seen how they add up. The first similarity are their ideas about the natural state of humans. Both Hobbes and Locke believed that humans live in a state of war without government. They agreed that government is a necessity for a better society. They believed…

Words 326 - Pages 2

The Covenant between Reason and Theology Essay

The concept of modernity and all of the consequences that accompany it have played an integral part in the development of the social, political, and economic theories and practices that define a very significant part of contemporary society. Beginning with the radical shifts in perspective of the 15th and 16th century, in which rationality began to triumph over religion for the first time after centuries of a holistically theocentric dominance, the secularization of government gradually progressed…

Words 2128 - Pages 9

MontesquieuStudyQuestionsAnswers Group II Essay

distinguishes Montesquieu from contract theorists such as Hobbes or Locke? The primary difference in approach to the study of politics and society that distinguishes Montesquieu from Hobbes or Locke is Montesquieu’s consideration of context. Hobbes and Locke are theorists who ignore contextual factors when discussing the formation of society and political bodies. Conversely, Montesquieu has an empirical approach to society and political bodies and takes into consideration all historical evidence…

Words 2265 - Pages 10