Another theme that the literature discusses is the pivotal role of emotion in understanding and interpreting the Holocaust. Rachel Baum argues that there are certain “obligatory emotions” attached to the Holocaust. Obligatory emotions are the expected emotional response to particular visuals, enforced by social standards. Holocaust imagery tends to produce emotions of “horror, sadness, sympathy, and pity” (Baum). These obligatory emotions are the basis of all Holocaust comparisons; the person drawing the comparison is trying to make people feel the same way about their cause as they do about the Holocaust. Baum asserts that, at least in a classroom setting, Holocaust memory should be connected to contemporary events (Baum). In other words, Baum argues for increased Holocaust comparison on the grounds that the emotion students feel towards the Holocaust shapes their view of present events. Thus, future injustices can be prevented by Holocaust …show more content…
Essentially, Whigham is arguing that since people can be taught to feel a certain way about collective memories of trauma due to their dynamic nature, comparison can be instrumental in preventing future tragedies. Whigham’s argument has a much broader scope than Baum’s. He is arguing for comparison of all collective memories of trauma, rather than just Holocaust comparison. However, both arguments rely on the existence of obligatory emotions of empathy towards persecuted groups to produce a productive comparison. Whigham and Baum agree that historical comparison, including Holocaust comparison, is positive in that it helps establish a moral framework for dealing with future conflict. The final key theme discussed in the literature is the idea that memory is dynamic rather than static. Michael Rothberg defines memory as “the past made present” and argues memory changes over time in response to outside influences. He rejects the idea that collective memories are unique and unaltered articulations of history. He instead claims that different collective memories interact in the public sphere, and shape each other