Homeric Heroes Selfish Essay

Submitted By sarahluke
Words: 1163
Pages: 5
Open Document
Sarah Luke
‘Warriors in the Iliad are more concerned with the satisfaction of personal desires than with obligations to others’. Discuss.
Epic poetry is a commonly discussed topic with in the study of ancient history. The view that warriors in the Iliad are more concerned with the satisfaction of personal desires than with obligations to others is one that is often contemplated. Throughout this essay it will be argued for and against this statement.
The first place in which we see a Homeric hero putting his personal desires before his obligation to others is in the setting of the poem. When Paris took Helen from Menelaus it seems intuitive to assume that he knew that the attack of the Greeks on the Trojans was a possible consequence. However he still took her due to his personal desire for her with no regard to his obligation as a warrior to keep his city safe. Although to a modern audience the above seems apparent, an ancient audience would not have held Paris under any blame and would’ve instead blamed Helen. This is due to the sexist nature of society in the ancient world. We also see Paris putting his desires first in his general attitude throughout the Iliad. In book 6 Paris is seen to be living a life of luxury in his palace whilst the rest of the Trojans are fighting in battle. Generally Paris seems to satisfy his desire for extravagance before consideration of his obligations to others.
The next place in which we see a Homeric hero putting his personal desires first is in book 1 when Agamemnon takes Briseis from Achilles. Not only is Agamemnon putting his selfish desire for Achilles’ ‘possessions’ before his obligation to Achilles to show him timé but he is also willingly jeopardising the winning of the war for the Greeks by ruining the dynamics of the army and causing one of the best warriors to withdraw from the war thus relinquishing his responsibility to the Greeks to lead the army. This is further demonstrated by his refusal to apologise and refusal to return Briseis to Achilles. However this seems to be a hypocrisy on Achilles’ behalf as later, in book 23, Achilles does the same thing when he tries to strip the second-place charioteer, Antilochus, of his rightfully won prize. This demonstrates that not only do the Homeric heroes put their personal desires before their obligations to others but also before their moral values. For the modern audience this way of prioritising comes across as very immature. Although the ancient audience may have seen any characteristics that the heroes held as virtuous due to the time it was set in (Bronze Age Greece). This time was thought of as glorious and sublime and so perhaps the character traits from this time were thought of in the same way.
Due to Agamemnon’s insult Achilles refuses to go to battle against the Trojans (book 1). This gives the audience the idea that he cares more about proving a point to Agamemnon and expressing his ménin than about his obligation to the Greeks to fight. However it can be seen that Achilles did not have much of an obligation to the Greeks to fight as the only incentive he had to join the Greeks on their voyage to Troy in the first place was to gain riches. We see him express a self-centred attitude again on his return to battle in book 19. Achilles refuses to return to battle despite the fact that hundreds of Greeks men have been killed and are being killed. However as soon as Patrocolus is killed, someone whom Achilles is very close to, he returns to battle. This provides the idea that Achilles is not concerned with his obligation to protect the Greeks but only with his desire for vengeance. However this could also be seen as Achilles fulfilling his obligation to Patrocolus to provide him with justice.
We see a Homeric hero on the Trojan side put his personal desires above his obligation to others in book 22 when Hector decides to fight Achilles despite the fact that his father, Priam, has begged him (through supplication) not to. It
Show More

Related Documents: Homeric Heroes Selfish Essay

Essay on Feminism: Iliad and Patroclus

Homer and Troy- Death of Patroclus Do the values of Homeric warrior culture translate into the movie Troy? The Homeric warrior culture is based on the principle that war is a constant fact of life. Defeat usually means the destruction of one’s property, slaughter of males and enslavement of both women and children. In times of war, women were regarded as objects and were considered prizes. Warrior culture also revolved around three main terms. The first term was Arête, which meant the innate…

Words 1385 - Pages 6

Heroism: Is Alexander A Grand Villain?

Heroes have something innately special and exceptional that other people do not have. These abilities transcend all moral judgments and control by having a deeper sense of morality and justice. Most well-known examples of heroism have stressed on the actions of bravery that involved guts, valor, and a risk of major bodily injury or even death. Military conquerors give their lives in professional service. Police and firefighters are accorded special recognition in most communities. Their actions involve…

Words 1162 - Pages 5

Essay about The Iliad

! ! ! ! ! ! ! The Iliad vs. The Bible: The Champions vs. the Slaves Prompt #16 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Ben Meade 10-6-2014 Classical Political Theory
 Deep within the complex structure of the human heart, beneath the material and the superficial, resides a longing for truth—a desire for purpose and explanation of life’s elusive mysteries. Unlike any other species on Earth, humankind does not settle for mindlessly fulfilling its most basic needs to survive. In the same way…

Words 1654 - Pages 7