Losing one’s life with merit enables one to rest assured without worrying about his or her shameful actions. In Shakespeare’s Macbeth, Lady Macbeth argues that “‘Tis safer to be that which we destroy than by destruction dwell in doubtful joy” (Shakespeare III.ii.8). By “which we destroy,” she means Duncan, which suggests that she is “safer” dead than alive in the aftermath of the murder. The only benefit from living is “joy” which is as “doubtful” as the Witches’ prophecies. Lady Macbeth’s part in Duncan’s murder haunts her for the rest of her shameful life. Thus, death would be the wiser choice. Furthermore, …show more content…
In Shakespeare’s play Macbeth, Macbeth fought a losing battle with Macduff, refusing to surrender and “to kiss the ground… and to be baited with the rabble’s curse” (Shakespeare V.viii.32-34). “Yield[ing] to Malcolm would ensure survival, but survival brings guilt from his heinous crimes. “The rabble’s curse” refers to the daily abuse people would throw at the disgraced king. Through dying in battle, the people of Scotland see him as a warrior who made the ultimate sacrifice as opposed to a dishonorable coward. Additionally, after seeing Banquo’s ghost, Macbeth describes that “ the time has been that when the brains were out, the man would die, but now they rise again” (Shakespeare III.iv.94). Macbeth observes that Banquo “rise[s] again” after dying and cannot be killed by anyone. Banquo, who died an honorable death, has his legacy live on in his children who become kings in the future. All the thanes, kings, and peasants of Scotland celebrate Banquo’s actions and his legacy. Macbeth, on the other hand, has to live with his reputation as a dishonorable murderer. Thus, dying with honor leaves a better legacy than living with