How Is Ulysses S. Grant Effective

Words: 751
Pages: 4
Open Document
Individuals remember President Ulysses S. Grant as an ineffective president who provided no reform for the American people during his 8 year term. Although, he was greatly revered for his courageous military tactics that took down the confederacy and ended the American Civil war. Many don’t know about the resentment he felt during his years in service. History often overlooks the fact that Grant was a struggling addict with the Patriotism of a true American leader. Grant’s heroic efforts helped to reunite a divided nation and create a society full of diversity and equality.
Ulysses S. Grant (originally Hiram Ulysses Grant) joined the military in May of 1839. During his first four years in service he served in the Mexican American War as a Quartermaster, serving under General Zachary Taylor and General Winfield Scott. While in service, Grant observed effective military tactics and leadership skills. He later used these tactics and skills to command a disfunctional 21st Illinois Volunteer regiment and was soon ready for battle by September of 1861. After taking Fort Henry and Fort Donelson from the Confederacy, Grant was promoted to Major General of volunteers, a title that allowed him to fully lead Union troops to victory. …show more content…
Grant did not believe that by taking the Confederates’ land was going to stop the rebellion. Grant knew that the only way to stop the confederates was to take out Robert E. Lee’s Army. Grant relentlessly tracked down Lee through the forests of Virginia, all the while inflicting death upon the Confederates who served in Lee’s army. Finally, on April 9, 1865 Lee’s army surrendered and both parties signed an agreement, ending the Civil War. It is quite interesting to think that Ulysses S. Grant felt such concern for the future of the nation that he went out of his way to end such a historical feud. Several years following the Civil war Grant was promoted to full General and oversaw the military actions taken during
Show More

Related Documents: How Is Ulysses S. Grant Effective

Grant And Lee A Study Of Contrasts Bruce Catton

The essay, “Grant and Lee: A Study of Contrasts,” by Bruce Catton, contrasts two famous Civil War generals, Ulysses S. Grant and Robert E. Lee. Catton begins by introducing the scene at Appomattox Court House, where the two generals met and determined the resolution of the War. Following this introduction, the author segues into contrasting the beliefs and standards of the men by drawing from the cultures of the regions in which they lived. This method of analysis by contrast presents an interesting…

Words 210 - Pages 1

History 112 Essay examples

Question #2 - During Reconstruction, the Republicans continually tried to promote and secure social and political rights for the former slaves. What was some of the major legislation used to achieve these goals and how effective was it? Do you think that the Republicans had the authority to implement this legislation, why or why not? During the reconstruction period, the Republicans were the Americans who continuously fought to protect and preserve the newly granted rights of freed African…

Words 681 - Pages 3

The Main Factor Affecting The Rights Of African Americans In The Period 1865-1941

‘The main factor affecting the rights of African Americans in the period 1865-1941 was federal government action’ During the period 1865-1941 a lot had happened in the regards to the rights of African Americans. The practice of formal segregation between blacks and whites had been introduced and implemented and the rights of the African Americans were experiencing very little improvement. From looking at the sources I can see that the majority of them agree with the statement however it is not…

Words 1012 - Pages 5

A Review of Cigar, Whiskey and Winning Essay

A Review of Cigars, Whiskey and Winning Summary Ulysses S. Grant was the 18th president of the United States. In the book, “Cigar, Whiskey and Winning”, it highlights his management skills during the Civil War as he lead the Union Army to defeat the Confederate Army. When he was younger, Grant attended West Point. He was not the brightest student, but he did enjoy reading. After he graduated, he became second lieutenant in an infantry regiment. In the book it showed him taking advantages of opportunities…

Words 1542 - Pages 7

Mississippi River Research Paper

sedimentary bounty of the Mississippi River shapes the landscape and sustains diverse ecosystems. By understanding the complex interactions between sedimentary processes, environmental factors, and human activities, scientists and policymakers can develop effective strategies for conserving and restoring the natural resources of the Mississippi River basin. Without the vital contributions of the silt deposition, the United States could not have ascended to the pinnacle of global power and influence that it…

Words 1904 - Pages 8

Southern States: Why They Fought In The United States

Why They Fought: Economic: Southern States were agriculture based. The whole of the southern economy rested almost entirely on the price of cotton and tobacco mainly as well as other agriculture crops. Northern States we much more industrialized in the NE, relied upon southern cash crops (cotton) for the manufacture of goods such as wool, shoes, and other fabrics and commodities. The mid-west was caught in the middle, while major cities did make up some of the mid -west, they were cattle and…

Words 5687 - Pages 23

Civil War Terms Essay

Sugar Act (1764) Revenue-raising act passed by the British parliament on sugar and sugar products Was stricter enforcement of earlier Molasses Act of 1733 Angered colonists, taxation without representation Stamp Act (1765) Direct tax on the colonies requiring all printed materials (legal documents, deeds, newspapers, magazines, etc.) to have a stamp on them Colonists had to pay stamp collectors to get stamps Declaratory Act (1766) Repealed the Stamp Act ...but, said parliament "had, hath, and…

Words 8628 - Pages 35

President: John Quincy Adams and Federal Government Essay

that no specific authorization to charter a bank could be found in the constitution, the chief justice argued that a right could be deduced from more general powers. Marshall thus struck a blow for loose construction of the Constitution, and a broad grant of power to the federal government to encourage economic growth and stability. In response to the second issue, Marshall held that the Bank was indeed such an agency and that giving a state the power to tax it would also give the state the power to…

Words 4036 - Pages 17

APUSH 18 22 Review Essay

1. The Popular Sovereignty Panacea 1. The Mexican Cession lands opened a "can of worms" with the question, "What should be done about slavery in these lands?" 2. Further, with this question, the political parties (Whig and Democrat) were put into a tricky position. No matter which way they answered, half of the nation would be offended. 1. Largely, the parties simply chose to side-step the slavery-expansion question (give no clear answer) so as to offend no one, hopefully. 3. In the election of 1848…

Words 6600 - Pages 27

Essay about Review Chapter 14 And 15

Chapter 14/15 Quiz Topics Southern Secession Secession: As soon as Lincoln was elected president, the states of the Deep South seceded from the Union. First to leave was South Carolina, which had been the front runner for southern nationalism as seen in the nullification crisis. Before Lincoln even assumed the presidency, Mississippi, Florida, Alabama, Georgia, Texas, and Louisiana had joined South Carolina in the Confederacy (the Deep South). After the battle at Fort Sumter, which set off the war…

Words 5898 - Pages 24