First of all, the book has many examples of racism throughout. While it is arguable that the purpose of the book was the exact opposite, the representation of racism is much more evident. To call this book a “classic” is to say that racism is okay and is a part of the American culture. Additionally, the colored people …show more content…
As far as I can tell, there was no plot. Every couple chapter could have been expanded and turned into its own book or short story. While the episodic format worked for To Kill A Mockingbird, it was a huge failure for Huckleberry Finn due to the lack of connection between chapters.
Furthermore, there was little character development throughout the book. How could there be? Every four chapters, an almost entirely new set of characters were introduced. First, you have the Widow Douglas and Pap, but by the fifth chapter, those characters are moved out of the story, and barely referred to again. The only prominent display of character development is seen through Huck and Jim’s relationship. Even then, it shows more of the wonders of friendship.
I believe the only reason this book is considered a “classic’ and the “start of all American literature” is because of its brutally accurate historical accuracy. Putting the racism of the time aside, Twain voices many Americans’ opinions on topics by the use of satire. He makes fun of the idea of government through Pap’s drunken monologue and human gullibility through the Duke and the King. However, I’m sure there are plenty of other books that voice these opinions that actually have a plot adding slavery into the