Incompatibilism: Do We Have Free Will?

Words: 1526

Pages: 7

Open Document

Philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre once said, “Man is condemned to be free; because once thrown into the world, he is responsible for everything he does.” This quote regarding taking responsibility for our actions in the society is based on the premise that we all have free will. According to Timothy O'Connor, free will is defined as the “capacity for rational agents to choose a course of action among various alternatives”, having alternative choices of action implies free will. On the opposite side, determinism is “a general philosophical thesis stating that all events and state of affairs are ‘causally necessitated’ by preceding events and states of affairs” (Chung & Hyland 172). Therefore, hard determinists believe free will is only an illusion. In order to answer the question of whether we should be responsible for our actions, it is necessary for us to answer the question of whether we have free will or not.
Incompatibilists are people who believe free will and determinism are incompatible, cannot coexist, and only one of them is true. Incompatibilists who believe determinism only are called “hard determinists”, and those who believe in free will only are called “libertarians”. According to hard determinists, our choices have been conditioned and controlled since birth, our actions are causally determined, and we have no control over what we do. A …show more content…
He was forced to quit school at a very young age to start working, because his father was laid off, and his mother was unemployed. Oftentimes, Michael watched his father beat up his mother, and the latter did nothing but endured his father’s long-term domestic violence. One day, Michael, who was eager to save his mother, murdered his father. Perhaps, the answer as to whether Michael should be held responsible for his action of murdering his father lies within the meaning of free

Determinism Vs Incompatibilism

question is about if humans have free will. There are two standpoints on this subject which we will be looking at in this paper which are libertarians and hard determinist. We will observe what disputes that these stances will make by looking at the following argument, which states that humans are not free, and seeing if this argument is sound. I will be arguing that since our actions are determined by prior events then we do not have free will. P1. An action is free if and only if it is possible…

Words 857 - Pages 4

The Argument Essay: The Nature Of Free Will

freedom is to ponder upon our relationship to the world; to what extent we are bound to the world and to what extent are we limited by the world as we encounter it. To measure this extent is impossible, yet it is this very limit that is a cause for debate amongst philosophers across the world and across the ages. We use the term “free will” to refer to this limit but what really is free will? There are many definitions of free will but one can look at it as is a philosophical term for a particular…

Words 535 - Pages 3

Analysis Of Van Inwagen's Chapter On Free Will

Van Inwagen’s chapter on free will states that if determinism is true, only one future is genuinely open to us. He also says that free will is the ability to do otherwise, therefore, if we have free will determinism is false, hence, the two ideas cannot go together. Trying to solve this problem van Inwagen introduce three major positions. 1)Compatibilism: the idea “that free will and determinism are compatible”(p. 257). The mystery is that Compatibilists believe that freedom can be present or absent…

Words 195 - Pages 1

David Lewis Incompatibilism Analysis

David Lewis’ Argument against van Inwagen’s Incompatibilism In his essay, “Are We Free to Break the Laws?” Lewis considers a dubious case of the ability to choose whether you raise your hand. In Lewis’ view, the claim: if it is predetermined that I will not raise my hand, and if, in fact, I raise my hand then, some law (of nature) is broken, “confers no marvelous ability to break a law, even though a law would be broken if I did it” (Lewis 125). What Lewis is disputing in this case is that, breaking…

Words 564 - Pages 3

Freedom: Physical Determinism Essay

The underlying issue is: Do we have some control over our actions, and if so, what sort of control, what extent? On one hand, humans have a strong sense of freedom, which leads us to believe that we have free will.[8][9] On the other hand, an intuitive feeling of free will could be mistaken.[10][11] It is difficult to reconcile the intuitive evidence that conscious decisions are causally effective with the scientific view that the physical world can be explained to operate perfectly by physical…

Words 777 - Pages 4

Classic Compatibilism Essay

Philosophy handout 10], “compatibilists think a favored sense of "free" on which determinism does not entail that there is only one thing we can do, or that we can't be "free".” That is even everything is determined(including the nature force), human beings could also be “free”. To be free, most compatibilists have insisted, means in ordinary language (1) to have the power or…

Words 1127 - Pages 5

Free-Will Vs Determinism

humans we like to believe that we have some control over what it is we do with our life, and the determinist theory appears to disallow that. Thus raises the question of whether free will and determinism can coexist, or if they are mutually exclusive. This is the “free will problem”, and it is a philosophical debate that seems to simply continue through time. There are several ways in which we can attempt to limit or defuse the tension between free will and determinism, from redefining what we mean…

Words 1952 - Pages 8

Personal Responsibility Analysis

The concept is similar for businesses and organizations that work to provide opportunities for others. They have a responsibility in providing products, goods, and services that are fair while serving a purpose. In either scenario, consequences are suffered when failing to do what is right. In many cases, when you neglect to be responsible, others may be affected in ways you may not have anticipated. However, I defend a person is legally responsible for an event when a legal system is liable to…

Words 1946 - Pages 8