Inductive Reasoning and Human Beings Essay example

Submitted By kealexa
Words: 2110
Pages: 9
Open Document
3/15/13
Hobbes
• Human nature is so self-interested and violent that human beings must enter into society to protect themselves from each other • Hobbes is attempting to find a form of government that is entirely immune to civil war • According to Hobbes human knowledge can never be absolutely certain, universal, or eternally true • Hobbes believed that Aristotle’s moral philosophy was “ignorant”: Hobbes says that there is no ultimate end or purpose to human life • Hobbes belies that we are naturally selfish creatures • He doesn’t believe that human beings have souls • He said the human being is a kind of machine: a machine that desires and thinks • We are machines tat have a desire for self preservation • Deliberation is the process of deciding t act upon your appetites and aversions • The word “freedom” simply mean not being physically constrained • He believes that human beings desire one object and then another and so on • There is no final good, final purpose, and final aim in life
3/22/13
Rousseau • He argues that the sciences and arts, far from being neutral or beneficial, actually made things worse: They have not only failed to improve the human situation, but they have positively harmed it. • According to Rousseau, science, technology and culture in general have made people less virtuous and less happy • His basic claim was that human beings are not naturally selfish and cruel, rather they have been made that way by the corrupting influence of their social institutions • Natural of physical inequalities- differences of age, health, bodily strength, and “qualities of mind” • Moral or political inequalities- those differences which “depend among a kind of convention” • Traditional accounts of the Origin of Political Inequality in Rousseau’s time: o Divine right theory o Superior merit theory o Social contract theory • Rousseau challenges all of these theories but he is also one of the first thinkers to realize the radical implication of Hobbes’ theory of natural equality • Rousseau’s “state of nature”- what the natural human being would have been like before the existence of society and government, and without all the artificial behaviors, thoughts, feelings, and desires that are the result of socialization • Rousseau thinks that socialized human beings have two kinds of desires: o Desires that arise from out basic physical needs- like hunger and sexual desire o Desires that arise from out intellectual or moral needs • The natural human being lacks knowledge and therefore is only moved only by the most basic of physical desires and fears • Morality is based upon natural pity • Natural pity is a natural repulsion or disgust that humans and animals feel when witnessing the suffering and pain of others • Rousseau thinks that this natural pity or compassion moderates or tempers our natural instinct for self-preservation • Rousseau’s evidence for natural pity: o Pity is clearly shown by animals o Literary example from Mandeville’s Fable of the Bees o Pity shown in the theatre • According to Rousseau it is only society that we learn to suppress our natural compassion and ignore the suffering of others
3/26/13
Hume • The main argument of Hume’s Enquiry I that human knowledge is severally limited • Experience is the only source of knowledge because the human mind is nothing but a machine that can receive, preserve, organize, and rearrange the information obtained through the senses
Section 1: Of the Different Species of Philosophy • Two kinds of philosophy o ‘East and Obvious’ Philosophy- the kind of philosophy that attempts to guide human action in the world o ‘Abstruse’ [Difficult] Philosophy- the kind of philosophy that seeks to understand human nature using reason • Hume says that most people prefer easy philosophy
Show More

Related Documents: Inductive Reasoning and Human Beings Essay example

On Hume S Problem Of Induction Essay

could make the inductive inference that all balls thrown into the air come back down. This has always been a popular way of inference, even providing the basis for science itself. However, Hume raises the question, “What actually gives us justification for believing past patterns entail future repetition of the patterns?” Hume claims we have only two types of reasoning available, demonstrative (relation of ideas, a priori) and experimental (based on experiences, a posteriori) reasoning (Hume p. 1).…

Words 1572 - Pages 7

Reasoning and The Heuristic Influence Essay

Reasoning and The Heuristic Influence Dominique Fortson National University Abstract In addition to decision-making, reasoning is also closely related and followed. Reasoning can often be described and divided into two types: deductive and inductive. Deductive reasoning involves reasoning from general statements, while inductive reasoning is the process of reasoning from specific facts. During this process, heuristics are often used to speed up the reasoning end result that may or…

Words 960 - Pages 4

Hume Inductive Reasoning

Moreover, the problem that Hume seems to be hinting at is the problem of inductive reasoning. Inductive reasoning is defined in philosophical terms as the manner in which broad generalizations are made from specific events. Inductive arguments do not guarantee the truth if the conclusion, instead it makes likely the truth of the conclusion. Hume suggests that humans justify their beliefs about unobserved matter of facts by reason of induction which he rejects because there is a chance that the beliefs…

Words 628 - Pages 3

Essay on Philosophy Study Guide

International Relations Study Guide: Hume’s views about casual reasoning and induction 1. Why does Hume hold that knowledge of causal relations is necessary for increasing our knowledge of matters of fact beyond what we can know just by present perception and memory? (Use examples) * Hume states that even though everyone may not agree, if there’s truth behind present perception and personal recollection, everyone would agree that only a small percentage of what we take ourselves to know…

Words 1340 - Pages 6

In Defense of Food Essay

relatively complicated question, but as he further elaborates these rules into specific guidelines, this summary turns out to be surprisingly complete. Using inductive and deductive reasoning, he debunks the ideas behind nutritionism and food science, and proves that the western diet is the cause for food related diseases. Inductive reasoning is when a…

Words 1231 - Pages 5

Essay on Hume (induction)

provide us with a more reliable method for establishing matters of facts? David Hume argues that matters of facts are not to be relied upon because of they are identified through the inductive reasoning which is an unreliable method unlike deductive reasoning. In this essay I will outline and analyse his arguments and reasoning for concluding this. I will also argue that whilst Popper’s attempt is admirable, he ultimately fails to successfully answer Hume’s challenge because he employs induction during…

Words 1342 - Pages 6

War Violence And Crime

the example of someone who would employ inductive reasoning. He would look at a body and, if two murders occurred, he could tell after examining both if there were any similarities between the two cases. He might ask the police if a suspect had been apprehended in the first case, and if so, what they could tell him about the man. This would lead him to conclude a similar type of man may have committed a similar crime--or committed them both. Inductive reasoning has its advantages: it is inexpensive…

Words 800 - Pages 4

Promoting Dynamic Interplay Between Study And Research In ELT Practice

A4纸打印，两端对齐，行间距1.25倍，左边距3厘米，右边距2.5厘米，上下边距2.5厘米。 Promoting Dynamic Interplay between Study and Research in ELT Practice Wu Benhu Abstract: This paper first explores the significance of research in comparison to the other two sources of human knowledge (i.e. experience and reasoning) in the context of ELT practice in China. It then elaborates the four kinds of study: receptive study, productive study, critical study and creative study, and proposes a practice of ever-advancing integration of various types…

Words 3076 - Pages 13

Rationalism In The Enlightenment

theories were developed by the ideas of philosophical morals being upheld at the time, and these theories criticized government structure.…

Words 796 - Pages 4

Chapter 14 Refutation 1 Essay examples

Chapter 14 Refutation in Practical Reasoning In sound reasoning the conclusion you infer must follow from the premises. If the reason is inductive, this means that its conclusion must follow with a degree of probability that makes it reasonable to believe (and act on) the conclusion. If the reasoning is deductive, the conclusion must necessarily follows from the premises. That is, the argument must be formally valid—have a valid form—and therefore avoid formal fallacies such as those discussed earlier…

Words 3676 - Pages 15