Intelligent Plant Hypothesis

Words: 1247
Pages: 5

As I explain the hypothetical method in logic, I will be using the article titled The Intelligent Plant written by Michael Pollan. In his article, he dives into the exploration of plants and their human-like capabilities. The idea of “plant neurobiology” is almost considered a blasphemy, mainly due to the prefix “neuro” and the notion of it only belonging to animals (Pollan). Terminology such as “learning”, “habituation”, and “intelligence” are reasons for many reviewers to refuse to publish such experiments that explore plant neurobiology. We cannot live without them, but they have no reason to rely on us human beings. As Italian plant physiologist, Stephen Mancuso put it, our dependence on plants breed a contempt for them. Animal ecologist …show more content…
There are four basic stages in hypothetical reasoning. The first of which is the occurrence or identification of a problem. To wonder why something in the natural world happens the way it does. The second step is to formulate a hypothesis in which to suggest a reasonable theory that can be tested. The hypothesis is a knowledgeable claim proposed as a believable explanation for phenomena or additional testing. The conjecture may not be derived from evidence but added to it. Its purpose is to narrow relevant evidence and provide direction. Once a hypothesis is created, the subsequent thing to do is to draw implications from the hypothesis that can be confirmed or disconfirmed by testing the occurrence of predicted. (“Method Part …show more content…
When all the facts are related and explained by the hypothesis, it is said to have adequacy. It is inadequate if there are facts that the hypothesis cannot justify. Internal coherence takes all the data and puts them into perspective where they are connected and explained by the hypothesis. A hypothesis that only explain the data individually has incoherence. External consistency identifies the hypothesis ability to complement preexisting hypotheses with high confirmation. If the newly formed hypothesis is not supportive then it is inconsistent. Fruitfulness expresses the longevity of the hypothesis resulting in innovative ideas for future research