The goal of the Joint Plan of Action is to reach a joint agreement and long-term complete solution that would confirm Iran’s nuclear program is absolutely peaceful. The thorough solution would enable Iran to fully enjoy its right to nuclear energy for peaceful purposes under the relevant articles of the NPT in compliance with its commitments. The complete solution would involve equally defined enrichment programs with practical limits and clarity measures to guarantee the peaceful description of the program (CNN, 2013, Iran Nuclear Deal: Joint Plan of Action).
The Media, the People, and Public Opinion The temporary nuclear agreement between Iran and the P5+1 is an essential step toward solving the …show more content…
As the P5+1 proclaimed success with Iran and agreed to lift some of the sanctions other believed that the agreement will be a mistake in the long-run. The biggest influence on the Joint Nuclear Plan of Action was the power states looking to lessen Iran’s nuclear construction. Since Iran is known for hiding and financing terrorist acts, the power states needed to come up with a plan to make Iran feel as part of the world and not as castaways. President Barack Obama and his persistence on making a deal with Iran also influenced other states. Although some think that it was a plot to get the people minds off of the Obama Care Plan. The United States seems to be the leader of other states. Our government and our allies are sticking together when it comes to Iran. The sanctions placed on Iran by the US was followed by other states as …show more content…
The Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) plainly denotes that, although enrichment is not employed in writing all states have the authority to peaceful functions of nuclear technology. Enriched fuel is generated when a refined uranium mineral is converted into uranium hexafluoride gas then spun in a centrifuge. Since NPT do not specifically state the word enrich allies believe it is acceptable to enrich fuel. The treaty plainly express restraints making nuclear weapons but not on nuclear programs. The treaty expresses no nuclear weapons but do not restrict nuclear programs according to allies in two parts of the policy. The Treaty states “the principle that the benefits of peaceful purposes of nuclear technology, including any technological by-products which may originate by nuclear-weapon States from the development of nuclear-explosive devices, should be presented for peaceful purposes to all Parties of the Treaty, whether nuclear-weapon or non-nuclear weapon States”(Carson, Arms Control