It is believed that John Brown’s massacres were ruthless. An example from the text is, “Brown and his men killed 5 men, hacking at them with broadswords and cutting their throats before shooting them”. (Doyle) Brown took a very harsh approach to the situation which was not needed. The facts clearly indicate that Brown had good intentions, but soon turned dark. Instead of going a more tactical route, he went the more “violent route.” Brown was a “hero” for believing in saving slaves, but the violence aspect was a stretch. …show more content…
This is factual because according to “Document C: Pike”, “Blair agreed to make 100 pikes for Brown for a dollar each, payable in installments.” (Brown ). Later, Brown would have used them to start a slave rebellion, if he hadn't been captured. As you can see by the evidence, Brown wanted to raise funds for his “cause”, meaning he wanted to grab more attention. Going back to the Pottawatomie massacre, Brown uses murder and violence as a solution. This rebellion plan was no different, leading to (most likely) more