John Stuart Mill's Theory Of Utilitarianism

Words: 930
Pages: 4
Open Document
John Stuart Mill was an early philosopher who aspired for a political society where man was not bothered by life demanded by other. To live at our own demands and our own choices was the true vibrancy of life that Mill believed all man craved. Mills faith in humans and their rationality created the harm principle. The harm principle was introduced, which states, “That principle is, that the sole end for which mankind are warranted, individually or collectively, in interfering with the liberty of action of any of their number, is self-protection. That the only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised over any member of a civilized community, against his will, is to prevent harm to others. His own good, either physical or moral, is not a sufficient warrant.” (197). In regards to the harm principle, I believe it consists …show more content…
This principle specifically relates to Mill due to his theory of utilitarianism. The goal of this theory was to justify the foundation of morals, as well as, suggests that actions are right as long as they promote happiness, focusing on the consequence of the actions rather than the rights. This notion highly connects with his theory of the harm principle. The harm principle suggests that any actions that do not harm, are not considered an act of violence, which relates to Mills entire moral ethic and what he believes is right. Mill provides principles and laws that regulate and support his theory in order to keep a balanced society. A civilized society to Mill as stated in the quote, is to prevent harm to one another. The state would only interfere with people holding and expressing their views if it caused harm to other, so there was not absolute freedom, however, this is what Mill strived for. A false censorship of discussion was more acceptable than certainty, as it allowed for liberty and opinion, as well as justifying claims without any danger. Mill believes it would be cowardly
Show More

Related Documents: John Stuart Mill's Theory Of Utilitarianism

Mill Utilitarianism

Both Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill's ethical theory were based on Utilitarianism. Utilitarianism is closely related to hedonism because it takes the principle that pleasure and pain are things that make an action right or wrong. Utilitarianism is a theory to which morally good action are those whose consequences produce the greatest happiness. In this way, there are two basic elements that define utilitarianism: its way of relating the good to the happiness of individuals and their consequentialism…

Words 326 - Pages 2

Kant Vs Mill

Philosophical theories are many in count: fit for different likes, dislikes, and beliefs of people. As such, the theories proposed by John Stuart Mill or Immanuel Kant might seem right or wrong depending on the subjective viewpoint of the audience. One thing is for certain though, both the mentioned authors are exceptional philosophers with a huge investment in the field. John Stuart Mill (1806-1873), a talented British philosopher, proposed various theories that set the basis for different disciplines…

Words 585 - Pages 3

Utilitarianism and Pleasure Essay

Utilitarianism is a political-ethical theory that was developed by Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill and that claims “all actions should be directed toward achieving the greatest happiness for the greatest number of people”[2]. By utility of actions what meant by Mill, is the satisfaction of actions to produce happiness in the society[3]. By happiness, what he meant is intended pleasure or the prevention of pain[4]. Mill also tries to define the essence of real pleasure. Mill’s pleasure conception…

Words 609 - Pages 3

Biography Of John Stuart Mill

John Stuart Mill was born in London in 1806. In 1873 Mill wrote an autobiography gave great examples about his life and the education he had received. Mill was given this education by his father with the assistance of Jeremy Bentham and Francis Place (Mautner, 2014). Mill had learned to speak Greek by the age of three and then Latin a little later on. Mill was a competent logician by the age of twelve. At age sixteen he had already became a well-trained economist. Mill then suffered a nervous breakdown…

Words 856 - Pages 4

Utilitarianism: John Stuart Mill and surely Considerable Theory Essay

Consider Utilitarianism, He Asked Nicely In the first chapter of Utilitarianism by John Stuart Mills, the philosopher introduces a question of endless mystery and enduring conversation similar to the arguments over intelligent design or even the creation of the universe. He presents an investigation with endless disputable hypotheses which searches for the primary source which determines proper decision making. Resulting from the delicate critiques of the current popular ethical opinions delivered…

Words 1509 - Pages 7

Essay on katie s midterm for philosophy

Opens Thursday @ Noon- Closes 8 PM Friday People Plato- Ring of Gyges, Psychological egoism Jeremy Bentham- Utilitarianism/ Greatest Happiness/Hedonistic Calculus John Stuart Mill- Utilitarianism/ Greatest Happiness Aristotle- Intellectual Virtue, Principle of the Mean, Moral Virtue, Teleology Immanuel Kant- Categorical Imparative/ Goodwill Epicurus- Ataraxia, Happiness, Epistemology John Rawls -The Two Principles of Justice Concepts Moral Philosophy (Also known as ETHICS)- is the study of morality…

Words 2696 - Pages 11

Compare Jeremy Bentham’s Version of Mill’s. Is Either Version Adequate? Essay

Compare Jeremy Bentham’s version of hedonism with John Stuart Mill’s. Is either version adequate? Bentham and Mill are proponents of classical utilitarianism, a moral theory underpinned by two elements, consequentialism and hedonism. Utilitarianism, derived from the word utility meaning usefulness, holds that the merit of an action is to be judged only by the extent to which its outcome or consequence is useful or increases welfare of the individual or wider society, (Barber.,p.52). According…

Words 1984 - Pages 8

Kant Vs. Mill-A Battle Of Ethics

Philosophy 101 May 19, 2015 Kant vs. Mill - A Battle of Ethics Immanuel Kant and John Stuart Mill were two philosophers who impacted modern ethics and morality forever. They each have two very different explanations for what they believe to be morally right or wrong. Kant’s view, simply put, is all people should not adjust what their “duty” is to mankind, no matter what may happen in the end, because it is morally just. Mill’s approach is that the consequences of one’s actions should be the determining…

Words 1311 - Pages 6

Rhetorical Analysis Essay On The Pursuit Of Happiness

Societal Improvement With every passing year, improvements to society with regards to technology, quality of life, etc. are made. The driving force of this need for progress is debatable, whether it be money, power, or something else. Philosopher John Stuart Mill attributes such motivation for societal advancement to the desire of happiness. Mill believes that humans desire to be happy and desire the happiness of others, therefore driving improvements to civilization for the benefit of all. Because…

Words 694 - Pages 3

Philosophy 241 Lecture Note Essay

commercial products. Review of last time: Outline of the subject matter of this course: 4 units, each reflecting a different approach to normative philosophical ethics: 1. Teleological/Consequentialist Ethics: Utilitarianism and egoism. Readings by Jeremy Bentham, John Stuart Mill, Bishop Joseph Butler; critique by Dostoevsky; some relevant contemporary feminist reflections by Marilyn Frye. 2. Deontological ethics: Immanuel Kant: Sections 1 and 2 of the Groundwork of the Metaphysics of…

Words 7807 - Pages 32