Judicial Independence In The United States Criminal Justice System

Words: 548
Pages: 3

In chapter 10, the book's definition of judicial independence is “ the concept that judges need to be kept away from the other branches of government; the courts should not be subject to improper influence from the other branches of government, or from private or partisan interest” (Burton 209). The chapter talks about how judicial independence needs protection from the United States Constitution. The book also states that “In the United States’ criminal justice system, even the most powerful citizens are required to follow the law. An independent judiciary serves as a check and balance for the powerful and less powerful, allowing no single person to be above the law” (Burton 97). The idea of judicial independence is to keep the judiciary away from any other forms of other branches of …show more content…
The lifetime term gives work security and permits appointed judges to do what is right beneath the law since they don’t have to worry whether that they will be terminated in the event that they make a disliked choice. This security permits judges to choose each case entirely in terms of the legitimate issues before them, no matter how disliked their choices may be. Judges also cannot be punished with a reduction in salary for any reason. Congress sets the compensation of judges in the federal system. This compensation can be raised but cannot be diminished once the judge has taken into the office. The compensation of a federal judge is almost equal to someone who is a part of Congress. Judicial independence also can be guaranteed by giving life tenure or long tenure for judges. Judicial independence is not only for the assurance of judges, in spite of the fact that it is regularly thought of in that setting nowadays. The bases of it are planned to secure the framework of the system of justice and the run the rule of law, and hence keep up with public trust and confidence in the