Jury Trial and Jury Selection Essay

Submitted By Lisa1tran
Words: 995
Pages: 4
Open Document
Logos: Appeal based on reason or logic. Logical reasons or examples/the logic used to support a claim (induction and deduction); can also be the facts and statistics used to help support the argument.
• Juror 8: Asked the jurors to discuss this for just an hour; won’t “send a boy off to die without talking about it first” Made each small point of his persuasion very easy to accept and as logical as possible so none of the rest could easily object to it
• Juror 4: A stockbroker who refuses to budge until he is presented with sound reasons for changing his mind

Ethos: Appeal based on the reputation and character of the speaker. The source's credibility, the speaker's/author's authority
• Juror 8: Had the needed character/frame of mind to be credible. He walked in to the deliberation unprejudiced and open-minded about the evidence given during the trial

Pathos: Appeal based on emotion. Emotional or motivational appeals to make your audience feel the way you want them to.
• Juror 8: Asked for an anonymous vote.
Couldn’t persuade the other jurors so asked to just take a vote

Contrast: Make what you want someone to do more attractive by comparing it to another choice that is less attractive.
• Juror 8: Asks the jurors to imagine the accused was their child

Simplicity/Clarity: The message is boiled down to its essence and uses language and syntax that everyone can understand. (Keep It Simple Stupid)
• Juror 8: Demonstrated that the elderly man who was a witness, that limped because a recent stroke, couldn't possibly have gotten to the front door quick enough to positively ID the defendant

Specificity/Detail: Be as specific as possible. Specificity increases credibility because specific details are simply more believable than broad assertions
• Juror 3: Demonstrated that he would swing the knife from up over his head in a downward motion if he wanted to kill a taller man
• Juror 5: Grew up in slums and saw many similar knife fights, demonstrated that switchblades are typically used underhanded stemming from the way the blade emerges from the handle.

Similarity: Find Similarities and point them out. Show similarities between you and your prospect, customer, or donor. Show that your thoughts, ideals, social class, and appearance are alike.
• Juror 9: Noticed that another juror wore glasses just like one of the witnesses because of the marks on his nose
• Juror 5: A man who was reared in a tough neighborhood slum, and who sympathizes with the plight of the accused and thought about if he was in the same situation, and how many people would jump to the same conclusion because of where he is from

Storytelling: Stories allow people to persuade themselves. A story will lower a prospect’s resistance, make complicated things easier to understand, and perk up their emotions.
• Juror 11: A foreign-born watchmaker focuses the jury on the beauty and responsibility of the American judicial process
• Juror 12: Often strays off course with advertising stories and slogans

Analogies/Metaphors: When you can relate your scenario to something that the prospect already accepts as true.
• Juror 8: Presents a knife identical to the murder weapon--a weapon that the jurors were certain was unique Counter-intuitive sources and arguments: Seems like it is the opposite of what common sense would tell you

Repetition: Words, sounds or images may be repeated to reinforce the main point. The message itself may be displayed many times. Works if they are repeated enough to pound their message into our minds.
• Juror 8: Gets the other jurors to think critically/creatively, regularly asking, "Suppose that..." and "Is it possible?"

Salience: The art of being silent. When you're not talking, you're listening to your prospect
• Juror 10: launches into a prejudiced tirade, the
Show More

Related Documents: Jury Trial and Jury Selection Essay

The Role Of Rape Myths And Jury Selection In The Outcome Of A Trial

The Role of Rape Myths and Jury Selection in the Outcome of a trial. This reading highlights many myths and stereotypes exemplified in jury cases involving rape. Judy Shepherd wrote the reading itself. In the following essay you will learn about a specific rape case, and how those myths and stereotypes affected the outcome. It will be strange to learn how some people can be easily convinced when presented a skewed view. First off before you learn about the exact trial and the outcome, one must first…

Words 1866 - Pages 8

Jury Trial Essay

Jury Trial Analysis Jaynice Harden March 16, 2015 CJA/364 Criminal Procedure Shane Krauser Jury Trial Analysis In today’s society, there are many people who know what a jury trial is and what is expected in the process of a jury trial. They may also know why the process is important and very necessary as it protects the citizens of the United States. The part that some people may not know about is the process that is taken during the pre-trial phase. Any and every individual that has been…

Words 1563 - Pages 7

Scientific Jury Selection

practice. Both of these topics seem to be prevailing concerns in the current discussion within research of this field. Effectiveness: One of the main interests with scientific jury selection rests in its effectiveness. How truly potent is turning to the scientific method when compared to the more traditional style of selection? This is a very important question to consider, not only because of the implications on equality…

Words 1549 - Pages 7

Criminal Trial Process Essay

Criminal Trial Denise Parnell Strayer University Professor: Catherine Terry May 26, 2013 Assignment: 5 Before a criminal trial can be held, federal and state laws require a series of procedures and events (Carp, 2011). The process of a criminal trial starts when an individual is arrested, or charges are filed for a warrant. After a defendant is formally charged with a crime, the case proceeds to the criminal trial phase (unless the defendant pleads guilty). When or if a criminal defendant…

Words 694 - Pages 3

Worth The Candle

academics, lawyers, and judges who see jury trials as guardians of civil rights and due process. Darbyshire’s argues that these theories lack proof and that the symbolic function of the jury far outweighs its practical use. In Ashworth’s words, area as sensitive as criminal justice theory should only be accepted if justifiable. The popular statement: We have ”a “constitutional right” to jury trials”, is what Darbyshire argues first. Claim that the right to jury trial derives from Magna Carta hasn’t been…

Words 793 - Pages 4

Law Juries Essay

into the trial procedure to be the arbiter of the facts of the case, strengthen the authority of the legal system. Slapper and Kelly (2010). However, Martin (2010) mentions that jurors are partly middle class and younger than previous when qualification was about owning of property to a certain assessable value. This limit meant that women, younger people and ordinary people who were less likely to posses a property were prevented from becoming jurors. The selection is done by the Central Jury Summoning…

Words 1313 - Pages 6

Flaws In The Criminal Justice System

are several faults in the nation’s court and criminal justice system in the present day. There is controversy all over the news about the race of jury members in cases involving white people and African- Americans. However, this is not the only issue with jury members. In capital murder trials, for which death penalty may be imposed, the jury selection process is a difficult one. Depending on the severity of the crime, criminals can be eligible for the death penalty. In these circumstances, a person…

Words 282 - Pages 2

Jury Trial Analysis Essay example

Jury Trial Analysis Fenisa Robinson CJA-364 October 1, 2012 John Huskey Jury Trial Analysis In the United States of America, the criminal justice system is based on the adversarial system or common law system. An adversarial trial allows the accused or defendant to be given a fair chance to prove his or her innocence. The Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution states that the defendant is to be given a fair chance to oppose the prosecution, have witnesses to help with his or…

Words 940 - Pages 4

Foster V. Chatman Case Study

of their jury selection process. So, I personally do not believe that there are enough safeguards in place to ensure the fairness of a jury selection during a trial. For example, when reading the Foster v. Chatman case, Foster was convicted of killing Queen Madge White. When the jury selection began there was already a disadvantage in relation to proportionality due to the fact that there were only minimal African American potential juror’s available for selection. Once the actual selection process…

Words 679 - Pages 3

Jury Disparity Research Paper

alludes to as “disparity in the jury selection process”. Talk about the procedures and cases that have controlled the systemic discrimination of the court process, examine how jury nullification issued in connection with diversity and talk about the utilization of legal difficulties to jury selection and the effect on the jury composition. Disparity implies inequality, things are distinctive or not the same. The author’s meaning of disparity in the jury selection process is clarified how Mexican-Americans…

Words 932 - Pages 4