In this context, what is just is perception, and what is unjust is reality. If someone prides themselves on being a “pederast and shamless” (Aristophanies 1984 p.152), then if they are insulted with such words then they are not being insulted at all, in fact, they are being complemented. If there is no context behind the word, if the word shameless is just a word and has no meaning at all, then it is not an insult. The Unjust speech represents reality because words are really just words and have not meaning or bearing to them at all, it is what we attach to them and the context they are being used in that determine the nature of the word itself. If we perceive things to be good and bad, then justice can indeed exist, but in reality there is no perception. In reality, words are not even words; they are expressions of wind that exist from the mouth. It is the perception and beliefs that we attach to these words, what we perceive to be “good” and what we perceive to be “bad” that determine if the words are indeed good or bad. We perceive pain to be a bad thing, but does that make a masochist a bad person? Is the term “no pain no gain” then a derogatory one? It is the context that we apply the words in that determine if they are good and bad. If words have no attached meaning and are merely just winds coming out of the mouth, then justice cannot exist because it’s the application of the words and context that define what justice