Justice Abe Fortas 'Black Armbands' Rights In American Schools

Words: 518
Pages: 3
Open Document
In this court case, the reader will learn about a US citizen’s rights and where they belong. Justice Abe Fortas believes students have full rights in expressing their opinions against the Vietnam war by wearing black armbands. “The prohibition of expression of one particular opinion…is not constitutionally permissible,” said Fortas. Fortas is portraying the fact that you can not take away the rights of a student at all. “In our system, undifferentiated fear or apprehension of disturbance is not enough to overcome the right to freedom of expression,” Fortas stated. Justice Fortas believes that the fear of conflict is not enough to take away the protesters’ rights. The constitution allows the people of the United States to express their thoughts. “A student’s rights, therefore, do not …show more content…
Students should not lose their rights, even if it is during school hours. It also does not matter if it is controversial or not. School are not allowed to take away the rights of students. “The vigilant protection of constitutional freedom is nowhere more vital that in the community of American schools,” claimed Fortas. Justice Fortas believes it is very important to allow students full rights in a school day. It is entirely important for the development of the student’s opinions. Protesting is what the United States is built on. The arguments he has been making are extremely valid.
Justice Hugo Black thinks along the same lines and makes some valid statements as well. “First and Fourteenth Amendments protect the right of school pupils to express
Show More

Related Documents: Justice Abe Fortas 'Black Armbands' Rights In American Schools

Analysis Of Justice Abe Fortas 'Arguments Armbands'

Armbands Justice Abe Fortas argue against public speech in an educational setting, while justice Hugo Black argue that one does not have a right to give speeches. In Justice Abe Fortas case he argues against public speech in educational setting. Justice Abe Fortas first argument was that the “undifferentiated fear on apprehension of disturbance is not enough to overcome the right to freedom of expression (4).Fortas is saying that fear cannot take away freedom. In Fortas second argument he reveals…

Words 383 - Pages 2

Pros And Cons Of Arm Bands

Bands In 1968 multiple students protested against the war, by wearing black arm bands to school. Principals of each school banned the armbands and later suspended the students. Justice Abe Fortas and Justice Hugo Black of the Supreme Court disagree on the Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School case .They both have different arguments and perspectives about the case. Justice Forbes agrees with the Tinkers. “A students rights therefore don’t embrace merely the classroom hours…he may express…

Words 372 - Pages 2

Arm Band Should Be Allowed In Schools Essay

A highly opinionated judge named Justice Abe Fortas believes that students should be able to live by their American rights and wear black arm bands to school, while another judge named Justice Hugo Black believes school rules should become before American rights; therefore, arm bands should not be at school. Are school rules more important than constitutional rights? Justice Abe Fortas argues against the students not being able to express themselves at school. He is able to back his argument…

Words 616 - Pages 3

The Tinker Vs. Des Moines Case

land-mark case in upholding the rights of school children, and their freedom to express their opinions and views. Many have heard of the case, while others are unaware of its existence. The real conflict, however is whether the defendants, John and Mary Beth Tinker were right or wrong. In December of 1965, the Tinker siblings decided to wear black armbands with peace signs on them to protest America’s involvement in the Vietnam War. After getting suspended from school, the Tinkers brought the case…

Words 859 - Pages 4