Justice Alito Case Summary

Words: 1856
Pages: 8

One case to look at in order help show Justice Alito’s judicial philosophy is McDonald v. Chicago, Illinois being that it’s a case that heavily relies upon the constitution, notably the 2nd and the 14th amendments. The case is originally set up via a previous ruling of District of Columbia v. Heller, which protected right to bear arms for the purpose of self-defense, in response to D.C.’s law, banning firearms in the home. Due to this ruling, the people of the Chicago suburb Oak Park sued the city in saying that the banning of firearms in Oak Park is leaves the community vulnerable to criminals, citing a overstepping of the 2nd and the 14th Amendments, specifically the privileges and immunities clause. This case was brought up to the Seventh Circuit, who affirmed the law citing three cases from the 19th century, two of which being the Slaughter House …show more content…
Not only is it important to understand these two concepts, but also his upbringing. Because Justice Alito grew up in a house where both law and education were important, he attained a certain drive allowing him to excel, academically and later through his career. Like all young college students, Justice Alito found himself involved in more liberal tendencies, but they seem to have been more about his views on the private sector and how privacy is best. After his schooling, Justice Alito began fighting aggressively against crime, due to both this and his achievements he was able to rise up the ranks in the judicial system until he took his seat on the Third Circuit, where we could start to see his judicial tendencies come into fruition. We see his dissents on cases like Casey v. PlannedParenthood or his discussions on Roe v. Wade which show both his textualism and conservatism start to bleed through. This drew many critiques by the time he was considered a candidate for Justice O’Connors seat with one going as far to say