Before the creation of the Juvenile Justice System courts, minors (old/allowed to get old/got older) seven (7) and above who was found to have committed crimes were imprisoned together with the adults. Whatever law is forced (by law) for the punishment of adult lawbreakers was applied to minors. Minors were treated as harshly as adult lawbreakers. In fact, in 1648, there was a law in Massachusetts which forced (by law) death penalty for any child over 16 who will commit the offense of cursing their natural father or mother.
Nevertheless, later studies and research showed that the jailing of Juvenile Justice System -related lawbreakers together with adult lawbreakers does more hurt than good not just for the …show more content…
One of the reasons is the (numbers of times something happens) of judges who abuse their (ability to make wise decisions) in putting in jail children for small and unimportant offenses without needing/ordering the same standards of proof which the adult people (who are being sued or who were sued) are entitled. See the case of In Re Gault where the United States Supreme Court overturned the lower court ruling of conviction of a minor who (claimed to be) made an obscene phone call. The Supreme Court found that minors who are charged with offenses in Juvenile Justice System -related court were also entitled to basic due process: notice of the charge, a right to give advice to, and elements of the right to trial, including angrily facing/standing up to witness instead of trial by (spoken/heard, but not known to be genuine) (In Re …show more content…
The fighters (against someone or something) of the Juvenile justice system argue that they are not effective in controlling crime. This is visible/is obvioused by the fact that research has shown that murder by children remained at a relatively constant level for the ten years before 1985, but it went through a large and disturbing once-a-year increase. In view of the failure of the Juvenile justice system to control criminal behavior among children, there are proposals coming from other parts/areas of the (community of people/all good people in the world) to shift the law-based policy from healing/repairing of Juvenile offender to punishment.
Facing a two-headed problem - should the state concentrate its efforts on preventing crime or should it focus on helping and healing law-breakers - the state has to choose between two options: Should the state use its useful things/valuable supplies to build more Juvenile sorrow for siniaries and put in jail young law-breakers every time they violate the law as a means of punishment or should the state use its fund to help in parenting, recreational and teaching programs that are geared towards the healing/repairing of the youth that are geared towards the healing/repairing of the