JFK's discourse was an exceptionally rousing and inspiring discourse to the American individuals. JFK began the discourse off by supplementing America and making nationals pleased with the nation they live in. By doing this Kennedy, could persuade individuals later on to be going to play a part with his well thoroughly considered motivation. Not at all like Kennedy's presentation Reagan begins …show more content…
By utilizing parallelism, he could underscore his plan and why it can be seen all through his discourse. This is demonstrated when he stated, "ask not what your nation can accomplish for you; approach what you can accomplish for your country"(Kennedy). By utilizing parallelism, he could make an adjusted stream of thoughts and utilizations it as a device of influence to impact Americans to go out and improve the America a place. Not at all like Kennedy, Reagan favored utilizing the expository gadget, analogy since he needed to contrast the issues of America with different things. He did this so his group of onlookers would grasp what his motivation is and what is occurring in his nation. By doing this Reagan, could get his gathering of people to comprehend his direct he was attempting toward make which was powerful, yet not as viable as JFK parallelism. The reason JFK's parallelism was better than Reagan's excessively utilized representations is on the grounds that parallelism enabled him to underline his plan and convince his group of onlookers to be ready and concur with his thoughts. Parallelism was a superior logical gadget to utilize in light of the fact that it can be utilized as an apparatus for influence which is ideal for an inaugural