Negotiable Clauses

Submitted By wickedgradboy

Words: 1821

Pages: 8

Open Document

Negotiable Clauses

|Clause Number |Ideal Position |Fallback Position |
|5.1.1 |28 days |2 months |
|5.1.2 |7 days a week |5 days a week |
|6.1.5 |UK laws |Californian Laws |
|5.2 | | |
|6.1.2 |Permit access only within |Permit access outside |
| |organization |organization |
|8.1 |14 days notice |28 days notice |
|8.2 |Terminate agreement immediately | |
| |from either party | |
|8.4 |100% reimbursement for |75% reimbursement for termination|
| |termination of the agreement |of agreement |
|3.1.3 | | |
|5.2 |10% |8% |
|5.2 |also if it is still useful | |
|5.3 |14 days |21 days |
|5.6 |14 days |30 days |
|6.1.3 |Authorised Users | |
|4.1.3 |No written consent |prior written consent |
|8.2 |either party | |
|10.3 |Week |5 days |
|10.4 |We want the licensor liable for |whatever ones we aren’t willing |
| |technical difficulties, having |to have |
| |everything we are willing | |

4.1.3 – cos we need to display on our secured network, not the WWW. Not acceptable, its impractical , fall back position, written consent on the WWW, but we are not happy because we want to send the file around as one branch may want to forward the journals to another branch, etc.

5.3 this gives a commercial competitive advantage as we get the journals 14 days before the print publication which in that time we can use the information effectively. 2nd part of this clause states what can be sent and what cant be sent….therefore we have an idea of what journals are going to be coming in a structured manner like we know what are coming in at what time, etc…some materials maybe available fortnightly and others quarterly.

5.6 it could severely impact our business activities due to the nature of our organisation.

5.7 It is ambiguous, and a big responsibility on their behalf and therefore it does not affect us in anyway. Let sleeping dogs lie……….they have made a bold statement, plus ambiguous court. We need accurate information as we are a medical company and therefore if it is not accurate could result in severe consequences. Therefore if anything goes wrong we can use something.

Clause 6

Clauses 6 and 6.1 were not changed because it was Killem’s obligation to issue passwords to Authorised Users to allow access to the Licensed Material and also to ensure that no unauthorised users have access to this material.

Jimmy Savile Should Not Be Legal For Libel Essay

when a media organisation damages the reputation of an individual or company by expressing comments, this can be regarded as defamation. If the person or company is exposed to hatred following the defamatory comment or is reduced in someone’s expectations, the claimant is able to sue for slander or libel. It can be argued that the suing of a media organisation for defamation can be avoided with reference to current legislation. The latest legislation states that if sued for libel or slander there…

Words 1573 - Pages 7

Now that's some smart advertising Essay

What is cyber defamation? Defamation is where a person intentionally states or spreads information about another person to cause others to think less of that person or damage their reputation. Cyber defamation is any defamation that is spread over the internet. For example if someone spreads false and derogatory information via email. Is it against the law? Explain your answer. Cyber defamation and all other types of defamation are illegal. If you defame someone and they decide to press…

Words 314 - Pages 2

Study Guide To Accompany Canadian Business And The Law

Study Guide to accompany Canadian Business and the Law, 5th edition Chapter 12 CHAPTER 12 OTHER TORTS Objectives After studying this chapter, you should have an understanding of • the range of torts that are relevant to business organizations • how torts arise from the use of property • how torts arise from business operations • how a business can manage the risk of liability in tort Learning Outcomes • • • • • • • • • Recognize that business activity can result in tort action (page 261) Recognize…

Words 4141 - Pages 17

Essay about Presentation: Internet Forum and Online Discussion Forum

FACTS: This is a tort about defamation on the internet. In this case, Brain Bukre, the former Vancouver Canucks general manager, has successfully won a default judgment in BC Supreme Court against five online poster who allegedly defamed him. He was defamed in online comments accusing him of having an extra-marital affair with a sports reporter. He says the comments are untrue, and court documents say he is suing for losses and damages to his reputation. The initial lawsuit is filed in April…

Words 637 - Pages 3

5th Circ. Limits Enforcement of Canada Defamation Suits Essay

Article title: 5th Circ. Limits Enforcement of Canada Defamation Suits The case in this report is about a defamation suit that a Canadian hotel won against an American blogger in Nova Scotia court but failed to gain monetary remedies when they enforced the judgment in America. In 2011, hotel owners Vaughn Perret and Charles Leary had sued Louisiana based Handshoe for his post on Slabbed.org. The post stated that Perret and Leary were involved in a corruption schemes involving Jefferson Parish…

Words 592 - Pages 3

Battery Vs Torts Research Paper

damage to a car and medical bills, a tort. Every tort will not cause a criminal liability. 2. Torts can be distinguished from a contract action because tort actions are established through the courts through statutory modification of common law or plain common law while contract action are grounded in legal duties parties established in their contracts. There are different legal remedies sought for torts and contracts. 3. The elements of assault are: an intentional act, creates a reasonable apprehension…

Words 665 - Pages 3

Citizens United Vs Fec Case Study

When it comes to businesses talking about politics or donating money to political causes, there are rules in place to make sure things stay fair and transparent. These rules, often governed by campaign finance laws, dictate how much money corporations can contribute to political candidates, parties, or political action committees, and what disclosures they need to make about their political spending. “The Supreme Court spoke clearly this term on the issue of corporate political speech, concluding…

Words 935 - Pages 4

A Brief Note On The Article

out that this would not affect Gordy. The rules of the law that the court used when making its decision was that the first amendment right didn’t have relevance in this case and that The Daily News used defamation against the plaintiff. Defamation is an untrue statement by one party about another to a third party. Slander is oral or spoken defamation, and libel is written (and in some cases broadcast) defamation. The elements for defamation are (1) a statement about a person's reputation, honesty…

Words 444 - Pages 2

Legal Studies Annotated media file Essay

Legal Studies Annotated media file Year 11 legal studies assessment 1 Term 1 Phoebe Campbell Contents Page Basic Legal Concepts – Pg. 3-4 Common Law – Pg. 5 Statute Law – Pg. 6-7 The Constitution – Pg. 8 -9 International Law – Pg. 10 -11 Public Law - Pg. 12-13 Private Law- Pg. 14- 16 Law Reform- Pg. 17-18 Basic Legal Concepts Bonds: tyranny of distance a bonus The thing to remember when you read reports that the US Federal Reserve's quantitative easing rollback…

Words 6588 - Pages 27

BA460 Avoiding Libel Essay

libel: civil and criminal. Libel (written or otherwise “published” defamation) was originally confined to statements made in the print media, but it now applies to statements made in the electronic media as well. The courts have interpreted libel as a more serious offense than slander (spoken defamation). In a global media age, this means defaming anyone, USA or elsewhere. Civic libel is defined as tortious (noncriminal) defamation of character by malicious publication tending to blacken the reputation…

Words 935 - Pages 4