Essay Leadership Analysis “Twelve Angry Men”

Words: 2842
Pages: 12
Open Document
Leadership Analysis

“Twelve Angry Men”

Olu Adewumi

NCLC 375: Prof. Ampthor

The movie “Twelve Angry Men” is about twelve male jurors, brought together in a deliberation room to decide whether a boy is guilty of killing his father. The deliberation starts with an 11-1 vote for guilty. As the movie progresses, the one man who had a reasonable doubt about the guilt or innocent of the young boy, convinces the other members of the jury to question the facts presented. This paper examines the application of leadership concepts in the characters of each juror. Throughout the movie several leaders evolved, the main one being Juror #8, the man who stood …show more content…
Juror # 8 demonstrates transactional leadership traits such as setting clear group goals and assisting group members in achieving those goals. He leads the jury that is ready to convict through a series of stages in which groups ready to acquit or convict, and those undecided-develop and then disintegrate.
As a majority to acquit develops (the vote to acquit or convict must be unanimous). We see the group dynamics shift until Juror #8’s lone voice is joined by 10 others. Psychodynamic theory is present in the scene in which the motivation behind the single-handed holdout's passion to convict becomes apparent. He has displaced his anger towards his estranged son onto the defendant, a "no good, ungrateful kid" like his son.
Each character presents themselves in a different manner. To gain a deeper understanding of each man, we have listed them, and a few specific characteristics that stood out:
Juror #1 (The Foreman): (Martin Balsam) A high-school assistant head coach, concerned about keeping the proceedings formal and maintain authority; easily frustrated and sensitive when someone objects to his control. (Dirks)
Juror #2: (John Fiedler) A wimpy, balding bank clerk/teller, easily persuaded, meek, hesitant, goes along with the majority. (Dirks)
Juror #3: (Lee J. Cobb) bullying, rude and husky man, extremely opinionated and biased, completely intolerant, forceful and loud-mouthed, temperamental and vengeful; estrangement from his
Show More

Related Documents: Essay Leadership Analysis “Twelve Angry Men”

Group Discourse Analysis

it is the job of a group of judges to decides whether a law or judgement is consistent with a countries constitution (Parks) much similar to the scenario in the play or film 12 Angry Men that follows a group for jurors through their decision making process. In order to continue this paper and conduct discourse analysis on it is essential that, it is verified that the board of jurors in the…

Words 1359 - Pages 6

MGT204 Final Paper

Group dynamics analysis What are group dynamics? Group dynamics is a system of behaviors and psychological processes occurring within a social group. When we built our first group, we really didn’t know how to start it, so we decided to follow group building process, first of all, know our team, so we decided to use some team building activities to help us get to know each other, building trust, facilitating communication and teamwork.After we introduced ourselves to each other in our first meeting…

Words 2484 - Pages 10

Gay Marriage Essay

SOWK 534- Summer 2013 Assignment #2 Midterm Elizabeth Colombo 7-22-2013 Dr. Bucholtz A. Introduction: Issue, Policy, Problem: Gay Marriage in the United States has been a contentious issue for the last twenty or so years. Many people view being gay as a new phenomenon or socially constructed unit; but the origins of homosexuality extend as far back as the history of people. With the emergence of bullying as a huge barrier to adolescent development as well as teen…

Words 4025 - Pages 17