At face value, the idea of helping those nations external to our own seems like something that a person of good moral character ought to feel obliged to do, after all one of the fundamental premises of consequentialism is that we should do the greatest good for the greatest number, therefore if we have additional resources then there should not be any reason to not be generous with our abundance and share it with those less fortunate than ourselves be it through financial aid, medical aid or food. However, if we investigate things just a little we discover that it is not quite that simple. As discussed in Lifeboat Ethics: The case against helping the poor (Hardin, 1974),There is a proposal that has been put forth of developing a world food bank which would allow for these poorer nations to draw from them in the event of crop failures and times of famine, however it is inferred that we may in fact be causing more harm than good by setting up a nations dependence on aid rather than teaching that nation how to support themselves in times of hardship. Another argument against providing aid