Department of Education) This can be seen through circumstances such as a single-parent family, a large family and a family that is constantly moving. It is found that the students in the previous circumstances “were more likely than other students to have low basic skills in mathematics and reading and were more likely to drop out regardless of their sex, race-ethnicity, or SES.” (U.S. Department of Education) Overall, it is found that if the student is in a situation where their family characteristics do not allow for them to get enough attention at home or at school, they will likely continue down the expected path of an at-risk …show more content…
One reason is that “At-risk students tend to feel more alienated from school, evidenced by low levels of participation in school as early as the third grade. In their analysis of the High School & Beyond data, Ekstrom and her colleagues found that at-risk students were less satisfied with their educational progress, were less interested in school, were less likely to enjoy working in school, were less likely to feel popular with other students, and were less likely to believe that other students thought they were good students, good athletes, or important.” (U.S. Department of Education) Because they no longer believe in themselves, punishing the student based on their academic success has little to no effect. For example,“One of the most frequently used strategies to deal with at-risk students is also the least effective: flunking them.” (Slavin, Madden) Flunking at-risk students proves to be ineffective because they don’t care, despite if they have a passing or failing grade. These are just a few reasons that the current school system doesn’t work for at-risk students. But, “Before change can occur in our school systems, it is important to understand the lives of