Malcolm X Dbq

Words: 507
Pages: 3

MLK and Malcolm X, two of the most influential civil rights activists in the 1960’s but whose philosophy was better. This essay discusses whose philosophy made more sense, MLK or Malcom X, for the civil rights movement in the 1960’s. The topics I will be talking about in this essay are whether working together or separately is better for civil rights issues and whether violence or non-violence should be used during the fight for civil rights.

MLK’s “I Have A Dream” speech describes how he dreams that everyone in the world could work together and get along with each other. He says “I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they are not judged by their color but by their character“ (Document 2). I agree with MLK here because I feel that working together for a cause and making change is better than working separately. Working together can make a difference and a bigger impact on people because they see that everyone is working together towards making a change in the world.
…show more content…
“I don’t favor violence”. If we could bring about recognition and respect of our people by respectful means, well and good - but I’m also a realist”. Document 9 - "The 'Standard' of the 'Document'" I agree with Malcolm X here because what he says is true. He says the only people who are asked to be non-violent are black people and that people never tell the KKK to be non-violent. I feel that using violence only in self defense is right. Because there could be people that go into protests and try to aggravate people who are being peaceful. There is also the KKK, which specifically targets black people. “In addition to these murders, violence persisted through mass arrests, jail beatings, lynchings, and church bombings”. On violence and nonviolence: The Civil Rights Movement in Mississippi. So Malcom X is right in using violence in