The very definition of democracy is a system of government by the whole population or all the eligible members of a state, typically through elected representatives. Let me reiterate the phrase “whole population” - not a majority but the entire system of eligible members, without any discrimination on the basis of caste, creed, religion, sex, status, locality, profession, etc.
If voting is made mandatory, it will ensure that the government will be represented by a majority of the population, not just a few individuals, castes, or sections of the population. Consequently, it promotes the enfranchisement of minorities - the impoverished, uneducated …show more content…
Mandatory voting would undoubtedly encourage people to talk about the contestants, the election and governmental policies with each other, openly without the fear of oppression.
Nevertheless, the most advantageous aspect of mandated voting would be the decommissioning of the policy of political appeasement, exploited by those in power. If a voter turnout of more than 90% is guaranteed as in the case of mandatory voting, then politicians would refrain from creating campaigns that pacify only a specific section of society.
Of course, mandated voting brings about its own complex consequences that directly deter free and fair elections. The most prominent one being the possibility of random or “donkey” votes. Undoubtedly, there is. But what's the assurance that every single voter till date has made a logical and reasonable decision before voting for a particular candidate? Therefore, these “donkey votes” are truly immeasurable and can't directly alter the results of an