The nonviolence approach, which King subscribed to, was not the preferred mode for most followers. A feeling of being too religious was shared by most followers, who felt that it epitomized compassion towards the oppressor. Black people were faced with aggression from the white people and it was in this light that the back people felt that a nonviolent approach was not the best approach. Religion, which is what King based the movement on, was therefore perceived as misleading and paradoxically oppressive. King was also of the opinion that consensus between the white people and black people were paramount in the equality fight. A majority of the time, it did not bear fruit. This was a strategy that some followers viewed as weak and a betrayal to the black movement (Duberman, 1969). …show more content…
If he had adopted a different approach, it is highly likely that he would not be accorded the respect he is accorded today. This is because violence begets violence and those using violence to fight for their rights would have been treated differently by the law. However, the transformational aspect of his leadership is evident because he had a long-term view. Violence could not be sustained for a long period and it would have led to more racial divisions, which would go against the ideals that he stood for. Inclusion of all people could not be attained through attacking others. Therefore, he could see that a nonviolent approach would bear more fruits than engaging in