Martin Luther King And Nonviolence Approach

Words: 558

Pages: 3

Open Document

ideologies, therefore, must have seemed an uphill task. A majority of these followers did not understand the intricacies of some of the issues King was trying to put across.
The nonviolence approach, which King subscribed to, was not the preferred mode for most followers. A feeling of being too religious was shared by most followers, who felt that it epitomized compassion towards the oppressor. Black people were faced with aggression from the white people and it was in this light that the back people felt that a nonviolent approach was not the best approach. Religion, which is what King based the movement on, was therefore perceived as misleading and paradoxically oppressive. King was also of the opinion that consensus between the white people and black people were paramount in the equality fight. A majority of the time, it did not bear fruit. This was a strategy that some followers viewed as weak and a betrayal to the black movement (Duberman, 1969). …show more content…
If he had adopted a different approach, it is highly likely that he would not be accorded the respect he is accorded today. This is because violence begets violence and those using violence to fight for their rights would have been treated differently by the law. However, the transformational aspect of his leadership is evident because he had a long-term view. Violence could not be sustained for a long period and it would have led to more racial divisions, which would go against the ideals that he stood for. Inclusion of all people could not be attained through attacking others. Therefore, he could see that a nonviolent approach would bear more fruits than engaging in

Mlk Vs Malcolm X Research Paper

rights, Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X stood on opposite sides. King preached peace, while Malcolm X advocated for self-defense. But the question is, who’s approach truly made a good impact? While both Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X were important figures in the civil rights movement, King's ideology of nonviolent resistance and integration ultimately proved more effective in achieving lasting societal change than Malcolm X's advocacy for separatism and self-defense. Martin Luther King's…

Words 629 - Pages 3

Martin Luther King Jr Vs Malcolm X

During the Civil Rights Movement, Martin Luther King, Jr. and Malcolm X were two important role models who represented the voices of African Americans who could not find justice from racial prejudice and discrimination against themselves in the United States. Although Malcolm X’s approach on social justice presented strong points during the Civil Rights Movement, Martin Luther King, Jr.’s approach on achieving social justice was more effective. Nonviolent direct actions, which include silent protests…

Words 646 - Pages 3

How Did Gandhi Use Non Violence

nonviolent measures to speak his voice. and destruction comes from those with little patience and understanding. Gandhi believed nonviolence was a force stronger than any other to counter any obstacle that comes your way; he thought of it as fighting for justice by not fighting at all. Man can create any weapon he wants, but that weapon won’t stand a chance competed with nonviolence. By adopting nonviolent methods, one can achieve what they want without causing damage or harm to others. This was very important…

Words 1165 - Pages 5

research paper

Kamal Hunter Ms. Divarco Inquiry Skills November 21, 2013 What effect did Martin Luther King Jr have on the civil rights movement? Dr Martin Luther king played a crucial role in the development and advancement of the civil rights movement. He grew up as a well educated and righteous man who was influenced by his father and grandfather who were both pastors. He graduated high school at the age of fifteen and received a B.A. degree from Morehouse College in 1948. This was a highly rated African…

Words 1083 - Pages 5

Compare And Contrast Martin Luther King Jr And Malcolm X

prominent figures of this era were Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X. Both of these men used very different methods to reach the same goal. King’s nonviolent approach went over better with different types of audiences and was ultimately more successful than Malcolm’s more aggressive approach. Martin Luther King Jr. was a young preacher in Montgomery who only after a year of living there took a leadership role in the Montgomery Improvement Association, during the…

Words 1135 - Pages 5

The Militant And The Nonviolent Essay

The names Malcolm X and Martin Luther King, Jr. are inextricably connected with the Civil Rights Movement in the United States. However each name brings different responses in the popular conscious, with an obvious example of only one being immortalized in Washington, D.C.. It is unthinkable to consider either one of these men to have anything but the best intentions in mind for their people, nonetheless both had different approaches to the movement. I think, in a way, King saw the struggle as one…

Words 2040 - Pages 9

Malcolm X Vs Mlk

Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X were two important people in the Civil Rights Movement in the 1960s, each advocating for justice and equality but having different approaches. MLK, believed in nonviolent resistance and civil disobedience as a means to achieve racial equality. His philosophy was deeply rooted in Christian teachings of love, forgiveness, and nonviolence. Through his powerful speeches, such as the "I Have a Dream" speech delivered during the March on Washington in 1963, MLK inspired…

Words 363 - Pages 2

Malcolm X Nonviolent

Martin Luther King Jr. was an overall well-respected and influential person who made history and changed many people’s lives. Along with Martin Luther King’s opinions on the democratic system and nonviolent ways, he received criticism and backlash for his ways. In “The Ballot or the Bullet,” Malcolm X feels strongly that King’s nonviolent ways failed to address the issues that were prevalent at this time. With the severity and urgency of the situation involving the oppression faced by African Americans…

Words 251 - Pages 2

Martin Luther King Jr. Vs. And Malcolm X

Well before the coming of Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X in the 1940’s Civil Rights activists were beginning the use of non violent action, such as sit-ins, boycotts, marches and freedom rides, to attain racial equality and bring consciousness to White America (Franklin, 2011, p. 511). From the 1940’s to the 1970’s there were four identifiable stepping stones—labor activism, challenges to the courts, nonviolent mass direct action, and assertions of black self-determination. Each stepping stone…

Words 1828 - Pages 8

Examples Of Undermining The Rule Of Law

The first approach in achieving change is through the government. Within an authoritarian government, the capacity an individual has to create change efficiently is highly restricted and difficult. Although a representative government gives individuals the ability to voice their opinions at different levels of the ladder system, citizens are still limited due to the imbalance among decision makers when power is challenged. The second approach is through violence. In the past this approach often uses…

Words 1756 - Pages 8