The Militant And The Nonviolent Essay

Submitted By KingCOLion
Words: 2040
Pages: 9
Open Document
The Militant and The Nonviolent The names Malcolm X and Martin Luther King, Jr. are inextricably connected with the Civil Rights Movement in the United States. However each name brings different responses in the popular conscious, with an obvious example of only one being immortalized in Washington, D.C.. It is unthinkable to consider either one of these men to have anything but the best intentions in mind for their people, nonetheless both had different approaches to the movement. I think, in a way, King saw the struggle as one over the minds and hearts of Americans to create true unity, while Malcolm X seeks to united all people of African descent around the world in order to confront globally oppressive systems of racial oppression. This manifests itself in the way they navigate the struggles of the civil rights movement and the form their leadership assumes. The two men differed greatly in their international perspectives of the movement. It can be argued that King saw his role in the global fight against injustice in affecting change in his own country when he states, "Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere" ("Letter from Birmingham..."). However, he was talking about his need to focus on civil rights abuses and organizing in different part of this country. It is not until he speaks out against the war in Vietnam that he makes a strong stance in international relations and in this case the connection with civil rights is the effect the war has on the population of the US and well as those in the affected areas of battle. On the other hand, Malcolm X talks directly about "our relationship with the freedom struggle of people all over the world" ("At the Audubon"). He speaks to the importance of that relationship, stating that "in order for you and me to know the nature of the struggle that you and I are involved in, we have to know not only the various ingredients involved at the local level and the national level, but also the ingredients that are involved at the international level" ("Not just an American Problem"). He talks about how in the US people of color look around and see that they are the minority. However, if they were able to look outside the boundaries of the States, they would see the great mass of people that they belong to, racially. Earlier in his career in leadership, he speaks in vague generalizations about "the white man" and "the black man," and for the need for black people from around the world to unite against a "common enemy" ("Message"). X sees all of the issues faced by people of African descent across the world as being connected and seeks to united black people everywhere, while King focuses on uniting Americans of all colors against racism. Martin Luther King's unwavering dedication to non-violence is a cornerstone to his approach to the struggle for civil rights and reflects his commitment to America. Dr. King states that "Nonviolent direct action seeks to create such a crisis and foster such a tension that a community which has constantly refused to negotiate is forced to confront the issue" ("Letters from Birmingham"). He wanted to create "a type of constructive, nonviolent tension which is necessary for growth" to challenge and change unjust laws and enforce just laws within the current framework of the United States ("Letters from Birmingham"). Operating inside the framework of the US becomes an important aspect of difference between the two men. Malcolm X was not interested in negotiation or compromise with the same system that started all of the trouble in the first place. While he stops short of advocating for aggressive violent action, Malcolm X states:
I don't mean go out and get violent; but at the same time you should never be nonviolent unless you run into some nonviolence. I'm nonviolent with those who are nonviolent with me. But when you drop that violence on me, then you've made me go insane, and I'm not responsible for what I do. Any time you know you're
Show More

Related Documents: The Militant And The Nonviolent Essay

How Is Martin Luther King Jr And Malcolm X Alike

8 I believe that Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X were both pivotal figures in the American civil rights movement, but their philosophies and approaches to achieving racial equality differed significantly. Martin Luther King's philosophy of nonviolent resistance and integration made more sense than Malcolm X's more harsh and violent methods for several reasons. King’s philosophy was deeply rooted in the tradition of civil disobedience as practiced by Mahatma Gandhi, which gives it a much greater…

Words 341 - Pages 2

Dbq Civil War

There were many factors that contributed to the Civil War. There were three militant abolitionist antebellum events that helped the slavery ending Civil war as well. These three events were known as The Liberator, Apeal of the colored, and Nat Turner’s revolt. Not only did these contribute to the war, but so did many 1850’s national events. Some of these events were the Kansas-Nebraska Act, the Fugitive Slave act, and the 1850’s compromise. January 1, 1831, The Liberator was issued by Garrison…

Words 1123 - Pages 5

Non-Violence, Nonviolent Movements, By Cesar Chavez

violently. Cesar Chavez, a civil rights leader and labor union organizer for farmers, believes nonviolence creates a bigger impact than violence. In his short except, Chavez utilizes pathos, contrasting ideas, and historical references to promote nonviolent movements for change. Firstly, Chavez evokes grief from the reader through pathos. While explaining the negatives to violence, Chavez continues even further with “…the struggle would become a mechanical thing. When you lose your sense of life…

Words 631 - Pages 3

How Did Malcolm X Contribute To The Civil Rights Movement?

As the nation’s most visible proponent of Black Nationalism, Malcolm X’s challenge to the multiracial, nonviolent approach of Martin Luther King, Jr., helped set the tone for the ideological and tactical conflicts that took place within the black freedom struggle of the 1960s. Given Malcolm X’s abrasive criticism of King and his advocacy of racial separatism, it is not surprising that King rejected the occasional overtures from one of his fiercest critics. However, after Malcolm’s assassination in…

Words 934 - Pages 4

Janette Thomas Greenwood's Bittersweet Legacy

The struggle for women’s suffrage began in 1848 at the Seneca Falls Convention in Seneca Falls, NY. Fifty years later that fight would come to the women of the New South as they struggled with the growth after Reconstruction and the accompanying problems of urbanization. A few of the issues that directly affected women were overcrowding in the cities, lack of services for the poor, and alcoholism. It was these urban problems that brought them together and would eventually lead the women of the…

Words 2018 - Pages 9

Malcolm X's Archetype Of The Civil Rights Movement

The First Amendment to the American Constitution guarantees the American citizens that no law can “abridge the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.” [1] This ever-so-controversial constitutional right has been instrumental in the making of American history, particularly in the shaping of the civil rights movement. Perhaps the very first image that may pop into one’s head when one thinks of…

Words 1088 - Pages 5

Civil Rights Movement and Black Nationalism Essay

English 1302.044 March 3, 2000 Militant and Violent Acts of the Civil Rights Movement and Black Nationalism The rights of African-Americans have been violated since they were brought over to America as slaves in the late 1600's to the land of the free. Great political gains for African-Americans were made in the 1960's such as the right to vote without paying. Still, many African Americans were dissatisfied with their economic situation, so they reacted with violence in the form of riots. Other…

Words 1210 - Pages 5

Malcolm X Vs Mlk

approaches. MLK, believed in nonviolent resistance and civil disobedience as a means to achieve racial equality. His philosophy was deeply rooted in Christian teachings of love, forgiveness, and nonviolence. Through his powerful speeches, such as the "I Have a Dream" speech delivered during the March on Washington in 1963, MLK inspired millions to join the fight against racial segregation and discrimination. Malcolm X, a charming spokesperson for the Nation of Islam, A more militant approach to race against…

Words 363 - Pages 2

American Indian Movement Research Paper

AIM also supported the creation of the Indian Health Board of Minneapolis to provide healthcare to the Native community. Its leaders took inspiration from the civil rights movement and the policies of nonviolent confrontation that many of its leaders espoused, although as the years went on AIM members would occasionally take up arms.” (History.com editors) For hundreds of years, Natives have been treated poorly. The white people began this discrimination…

Words 739 - Pages 3

Carl Cohen's 7 Arguments Against Civil Disobedience

only to its impact on societies and governments, but also to its status as a potentially justifiable breach of law. Civil disobedience is generally regarded as more morally defensible than both ordinary offences and other forms of protest such as militant action or coercive…

Words 671 - Pages 3