I agree that preconceived notions about the media is certainly prevalent and that many Americans do choose a media outlet based on what they already know or what political party they follow, but it shouldn’t be that way at all. In order for our country to be truly democratic, and not just in the political sense, we must not fall into societal norms of only watching one sided media. In doing this we are not allowing ourselves to creatively maladjust and see both sides of a story, instead the media is influencing our thought process and not …show more content…
I agree that in a creative writing news piece, certain sides can be favored, but there is a difference between being bias in writing, and leaving out crucial facts. There is also a large difference between a local newspaper writing about their football team winning a game, and the mass media talking about a terrorist attack. In the latter of those scenarios, leaving out details changes the narrative drastically. The issue with this is that our brains have a finite ability to remember new information, but when that space is used up with fake facts instead of real ones, people become inherently misinformed (Akpan, 2016). Mislead consumers have become an epidemic in our society because of false advertisements and biased news coverage. The consumer is becoming more and more uneducated every day because of the content they are receiving (Akpan, 2016). I think that this argument misses the big picture by saying there is little difference between “good news” and “bad news”, when in reality it is easy to see if a news source is being objective or prejudiced. The argument, that in order to be a creative journalist you must present a subjective persona, gets derailed when powerful media members believe that in order to be a great journalist you must be able to make objective yet creative editorial judgments (Sunderland,