Describe the argument presented:
In the first paragraph of this passage, Aristotle explains his principle of the four causes, in relation to Causation. In his text, he states that the first cause is from a material, the second cause is derived from the form, the third cause is from the change of the resting form or the force. The last example presented is described as the final cause, and is ultimately the ending purpose behind the form.
He uses this argument in context to the question of ‘why people walk’. He argues that we would say the cause for one to walk is to be healthy, be he asserts his idea that if another cause can interrupt that process, such as drugs, it could be the agent that brings something …show more content…
In relation to philosophy, his four causes explains how changes of movement for something is classified is indicates how as an empiricist, he is able to profess that through our senses, we can identify the meanings behind the causes and to question it. In terms of our society, as people, we are constantly trying to categorize, label and organize things in our lives, as most would deem that as innate human traits. Therefore, Aristotle’s principle is very idealistic for us, as it gives us a very objective idea of how to approach specific items. For example, if we look at a clock, we are know taught to think more in depth and profoundly about the clock, it’s whereabouts, it’s creator and the ultimate purpose for the clock. This argument is also important because the book, Metaphysics was written in 350 B.C.E, and during this time is when Aristotle came out openly and addressed his dislike for Plato’s utopia and rational thinking. Aristotle is known for his categorization, as shown through his ideologies such as Aristotle’s Categories as well as the taxonomic rank in biological classification. This proves how he is able to organize and systemize all of his theories in a step process that can help us as humans to fulfill our need of a disorderly and chaos free