Milgram Experiment Evaluation

Words: 619
Pages: 3
Open Document
The most famous study of obedience in psychology was carried by Stanley Milgram in 1963. Stanley Milgram is a psychologist that wanted to do an experiment focusing on the conflict between obedience to authority and personal beliefs.
Milgram wanted to investigate whether Germans were more obedient to authority figures than other nationalities. For example, during the Nuremberg trials, Nazi the main defense argument given by Nazis on trial for the killings in the World War 2, was “I was following orders”. Milgram selected volunteers for his experiment by advertising for male participants at Yale University. The procedure was that the participant got paired with another person and they drew straws to find out who would be the “learner” and who …show more content…
Psychologists predicted that only 1% would go all the way to 450 volts. This is outrageous, but 90% went all the way. Milligram did more than one experiment and all he did was changed the situation to see how this affected obedience. I honestly though only less than few would go all the way, but I guess I'm wrong. I guess the theory is true, humans can be are really cruel.
The criticism from the Milgram study is that this experiment can cause serious stress. Participants are exposed to extremely stressful situations that can cause signs of sweating, stuttering, and biting lips. Milgram made a comment that sign of stress would be short time. Once the experiment was done the administer would say that the learner is okay. That made the teacher feel relief and stress levels decreased. After a year of the experiment, the participants were thrilled that they had taken part of the experiment.
Ordinary people are more likely to follow orders given by an authority figure, even to the extent of killing innocent people. We obey authority because of he the way we they are brought up to. People tend to obey orders from other people if they look like an authority figure because they are viewed as morally right/ or legally based. Authority is learned from a variety of situations, for example in the family, school, and
Show More

Related Documents: Milgram Experiment Evaluation

Stanley Milgram's Experiment

Psychologist Stanley Milgram, examined how justification from doing horrible things was often used by good Germans during the Holocaust, claiming that they were just following orders from their superior. Therefore, Milgram conducted an experiment in 1996, measuring how far individuals would go in harming/killing another person when obeying authority figures, and how easy they could be influenced. So, Milgram advertise a learning lab experimental study were 40 males volunteer and were introduced to…

Words 347 - Pages 2

Zimbardo's Societal Roles

and Stanley Milgram were able to prove that the roles placed on a person and the authority given to them from that role by another even more powerful person, affect how they treat others. Phillip Zimbardo was a man who wondered why people tend to view others, like prison guards, as ruthless creatures. Zimbardo wanted to know if it was the prison environment or if it was just the guard’s personalities. To discover this, he conducted…

Words 1223 - Pages 5

Freud's Theory Of The Structure Of Social-Agency Theory And Social Identity Theory

knowledge further in the exam way. There are 5 summaries covering all the areas of the syllabus. 1) Content Summaries – (focusing on the theories you have to learn for each approach) Approach/ Theory Explanation Evaluation 6 points to describe it each theory 4 evaluations of each one – use either: - GRAVE Or these points to evaluate it: - 1) It is supported by evidence 2) However the methods they use can be negatively evaluated… 3) It has practical applications – can be used in everyday…

Words 411 - Pages 2

Evaluation Obedience Essay

Evaluation points: Explanations of Obedience Agentic state Milgram’s participants knew it was wrong but put the responsibility on the experimenter At the Nuremberg Trials many Nazis said they were just following orders It explains why some people do not obey – they have stayed in the autonomous state A weakness is that there is no evidence that this shift takes place and it cannot be measured. The theory is vague and does not explain fully why or how the shift takes place. One way in…

Words 464 - Pages 2

Essay on Conformity and Obedience

about understanding what is meant by and distinguishing the differences between the terms conformity and obedience. It will show the evaluation of two key psychological studies which seek to explain why people do and do not conform, also with explanations of minority influence. Whilst seeking to understand the reasons why people obey authority, it will show an evaluation of Milgram’s study of obedience, discussing the ethical issues raised from the research and…

Words 3311 - Pages 14

Written Report Essay

Elsa Pham-Minh Evaluation of the argument Group Minds by Doris Lessing 1. Provide a short summary Doris Lessing’s Group Minds talks about the fact that human nature belongs to groups. Throughout the entire essay, Doris Lessing talks about critical thinking. What she means by critical thinking is the ability to think for ourselves and to disagree. According to Lessing, being able to think critically also means that we are educated and have our own opinions. She talks about critical thinking…

Words 824 - Pages 4

Essay on John Doris’s criticism of Aristotelian virtue ethics

virtue ethics utilizing and supporting Situationist experiments is an interesting position but I argue that the points brought forth by Kamtekar in response to situationist criticisms are superior, supporting the ideals of virtue ethics on character. I will first explain Aristotle’s views regarding virtue ethics and the criticisms that empirical psychology brings up and attempts to support with the consequences of several situationist experiments discussed by John Doris. Aristotle is a virtue ethicist…

Words 1417 - Pages 6

Essay on Organisational behaviour

Teams + Leadership Group Dynamics Group: Two or more people acting interdependently to achieve a common objective. The “strength” of the interaction depends on: 1. The nature of the common objective 2. The context in which it takes place 3. The temperament of the group members. Kind of groups Groups can be FORMAL or INFORMAL, the work of the Human Relations School. FORMAL: In organizations, formal groups are intentionally formed to achieve an objective set by the organization itself…

Words 2055 - Pages 9

Social Psychology Essay

PSYC 221 - Social Psychology PSYC 221 Sections 0101 & 0201 – University of Maryland – Fall 2012 WHAT IS SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY AND WHAT DO SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGISTS DO? Social psychology is the scientific study of how people’s thoughts, feelings and behavior are influenced by the actual, imagined, or implied presence of other people (Allport, 1985). In other words, Social Psychologists try to understand the mental processes that determine how we think about ourselves and other people and how those other people…

Words 9483 - Pages 38

Social Psychology Review Guide

processes (social psych: how these mental processes work with respect to social info) A Brief History of Social Psychology ~1880-1935 (Birth, Infancy, Gathering Forces) Founder of social psychology Normal Triplett (first research article & experiment: bicyclists race faster in the presence of other racers) Max Ringelmann (published later; individuals perform worse on simple tasks in presence of others) These two individuals asked social psychologists two questions: Is individual performance…

Words 3848 - Pages 16