Mind and Causation- David Hume Essay

Submitted By jjmichelle96
Words: 399
Pages: 2
Open Document
On Causation- David Hume
Scottish philosopher and historian, David Hume, is known for his extreme empiricism, with the idea that philosophy cannot go beyond our experience. Causation is the power or necessary connexion that cause our impressions. All ideas are gained through experience. Hume says that, “all our ideas are nothing but but copies of our impressions, or, in other words, that it is impossible for us to think of anything, which we have not antecedently felt, either by our external or internal senses…” To elaborate, there are no sentimental impressions on causation, only the ‘cause’ and ‘effect’. In a single instance we are not capable of discovering any power or necessary connextion as to what ties the effect to the cause. We have no experience on the power of causation, only the experience that one object follows another. However, if we could discover the power of a cause in our minds, Hume says we could foresee the effect of the cause before it ever happens, ever without experiencing it. We may feel that we have the experience of causation, but this is due to volition, which effects our mind and bodily motions. Hume says,
“The motions of our body follows the command of our will,” and the influence of a will is derived from our consciousness. Although, there is no bigger mystery than that of the, “union of soul with body; by which a supposed spiritual substance acquires such an influence over material one, that the most refined thought is able to actuate the grossest matter,”. However, if we were able to perceive any power from our impressions, then we
Show More

Related Documents: Mind and Causation- David Hume Essay

Descartes v Hume Essay

construct of the human mind. The ability to think is undeniable proof of existence and self is an innate idea created by the mind or soul. So self is just a continuous awareness of one’s individual existence. David Hume was an empiricist who believed that knowledge came from the way one’s mind perceived the physical world. He claimed that there was no such thing as an innate idea, which is an idea present in the human mind that was not created through some sort of experience. Hume argued that people…

Words 1531 - Pages 7

Classic Compatibilism Essay

The problem raised by Hume is mainly in the section called "free will", as the first proposed in the book A Treatise of Human Nature(2.3.1 - 2)[ Hume, D. (2009). A treatise of human nature being an attempt to introduce the experimental method of reasoning into moral subjects. Waiheke Island: Floating Press.], later, in slightly modified form, in the Enquiry concerning Human Understanding (SEC. 8)[ Hume, D., & Bigge, L. (1975). Enquiries concerning human understanding…

Words 1127 - Pages 5

Shannon Hume Essay

Shannon Mulholland Professor Wilson Hume Paper 3/30/15 Hume brings to life an often-overlooked conceptualization referring to the limited knowledge that a human being can attain in regards to God. Based on the experiences and expectations that man has been subject to, he is biologically designed to examine an effect from the root cause, and attach a new postulation that coincides with such a cause. This is very different with respect to God since we can only examine the observable universe rather…

Words 1083 - Pages 5

Schools Of Experience: The Sole Source Of Our Knowledge

idea or belief that hasn’t been created through experience. Therefore, our experiences are the sole source for our knowledge. For example, if my friend were to be engaged to be married, she would know that she was getting married based off of causation. Her experience of getting engaged would lead to her knowledge of marriage in the future. When comparing the two schools, it is evident that the Empiricist’s are correct and that our knowledge is formed from experiences. Empiricists deny…

Words 1950 - Pages 8

Philosophy Of Psychology

Essay #1 Draft Question One Although it is difficult to oppose any of these great minds, Plato would be my choice for the person that least represents my own philosophy of psychology, while Aristotle would be most representative of my own thoughts. Aristotle takes an intriguing position on the importance of human knowledge, as he judged human knowledge in terms of its value to human life. My own views are similar to Aristotle’s, as I also believe that all human knowledge, if it is…

Words 2545 - Pages 11