Essay on Miranda vs Arizona

Submitted By mp22261
Words: 577
Pages: 3
Open Document
February 25, 2013
PLS 135

Miranda vs. Arizona In Miranda v. Arizona, the Supreme Court ruled that detained criminal suspects, prior to police questioning, must be informed of their constitutional right to an attorney and against self-incrimination. Ernesto Miranda was the plaintiff and the state of Arizona was the defendant.
Ernesto Miranda was convicted of the March 1963 kidnapping and rape of an eighteen-year-old girl in Phoenix, Arizona. After the crime the police picked up Miranda because he fit the description of the girl’s attacker. The officers took him into an interrogation room and told him that he had been identified by the victim, although that was false. After the police questioned Miranda for two hours, he confessed. At the trial, the defense counsel tricked one of the detectives into admitting that Miranda was never given the opportunity to seek advice from an attorney before his interrogation. Miranda was convicted and sentenced to 40-60 years in prison. When he tried to appeal, the U.S. Supreme Court set aside his conviction. Then Chief Justice Warren wrote: “Prior to and questioning, the person must be warned that he has the right to remain silent, that any statement he does make may be used as evidence against him, and that he has a right to the presence of an attorney, either retained or appointed…”
Miranda was retried, only this time without his confession being introduced into evidence at the trial, he was convicted again. Even though his original confession couldn’t be used, one of his old girlfriends told court that he told her about the rape and kidnapping. After Miranda was paroled in 1972, spent time in and out of prison before he was finally stabbed to death in a bar. Thanks to this case the United States now has Miranda rights: “You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say will be used against you in a court of law. You have the right to an attorney during interrogation; if you cannot afford an attorney, one will be appointed to you.”, that all police must read to a person when they are arrested, to inform them of their rights.
This ruling was needed in America, because some people that are arrested are innocent. If this case
Show More

Related Documents: Essay on Miranda vs Arizona

Miranda: Miranda V. Arizona and Case Miranda Vs Essay

Miranda v. Arizona What is Miranda and how has it strengthened or weakened the ability of the police to solve crimes? I will answer this question by first looking at Miranda and what it means and who it applies to. Next we will look at the case Miranda vs. Arizona and how this ruling effect our justice system. Finally was this case and ruling important to our justice system and the way police are able to solve crimes today. To begin what is Miranda? Who does Miranda apply to? When an officer of…

Words 561 - Pages 3

Miranda Vs Arizona Essay

Miranda v. Arizona Another signature case that impacted and transformed police practices nationwide was the case of Miranda v. Arizona seen by the Warren Court. On March 13, 1963 police arrested Ernesto Miranda who was linked to the kidnapping and rape of some 18-year-old woman 10 days earlier. After being identified through a police lineup officers aggressively integrated Mr. Miranda. However, the police officers failed to inform Miranda of his Fifth Amendment right which protects against self-incrimination…

Words 433 - Pages 2

Miranda Vs Arizona Research Paper

The Miranda v. Arizona court case has made a dramatic impact and is a very important right you have as a citizen of the United States. The Miranda v. Arizona Supreme Court case is a Supreme Court decision. Miranda v. Arizona in 1966 ruled that an arrested individual in entitled to rights against self-incrimination and an attorney under the 5th and 6th amendments of the United States Constitution. Once the suspect is under arrest, the officer must say something similar to: “You have the right to remain…

Words 589 - Pages 3

Miranda Vs Arizona Case Study

Miranda v. Arizona SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES 384 U.S. 436 February 28-March 2, 1966, Argued; June 13, 1966, Decided FACTS: The Supreme Court case of Miranda V. Arizona is regarding issues of what was allowable evidence gathered during police investigations and interrogations. On March 13, 1963, Ernesto Miranda was arrested for the kidnapping and rape of an eighteen-year-old woman, during the arrest and interrogation the officers did not notify him of his Fifth Amendment rights. However…

Words 1024 - Pages 5

Miranda Vs Arizona 384 US 436 Summary

The Case: Miranda v Arizona 384 U.S. 436 (1966) The Facts: In Miranda v Arizona, Ernesto Miranda was arrested for his suspected connection with a rape. Miranda was taken by police to the station where he was questioned in an interrogation room by two officers. At no point was Miranda advised that he had the right to have an attorney present. Two hours into the interrogation Miranda had signed a confession. At the top of the signed confession the document stated that Miranda’s confession “was made…

Words 1149 - Pages 5

Essay on Student: Supreme Court of the United States and Miranda Vs

27, 2013 Before the famous case of Miranda vs. Arizona (1967), law enforcement could use many tactics and forces to get someone to answer questions or give information without them know what their rights are under federal law. On March 13, 1963 Ernesto Miranda was arrested for the kidnapping and rape of an eighteen year old girl in Phoenix, Arizona. During his arrest and interrogation Miranda admitted to the crime and even signed it in writing. Miranda was officially arrested for his crime and…

Words 660 - Pages 3

Miranda V. Arizona 384 US 436 Summary

In the case law Miranda vs. Arizona, 384, U.S 436, which was argued starting from February 28th, 1966-March 1, 1966. The supreme court of the United Sates combined four separate cases in which had an issue regarding the admissibility of statements and evidence obtained during police interrogations. The defendants were questioned by police officers while being in police custody, and kept the defendants in rooms that were completely cut off from the outside world. The first defendant was charged with…

Words 498 - Pages 2

Essay about warrens court

own hands based off their social and personal views. Innocent men and woman were arrested daily because of some police’s higher authority they thought they had. Supreme Court cases Miranda v. Arizona and Brown vs. Mississippi made substantial influence for the better in police work and procedure. Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966), was a landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court. The Court concluded that remittable responses made in reference to questioning of the accused criminal…

Words 628 - Pages 3

Miranda Rights: The Right To Remain Silent

their Miranda Rights. I’m sure you never really put much thought into what the officer was saying except when he says “You have the right to remain silent” which we all know is the first line in the Miranda rights. I know because I was also one of those people that never payed much attention. Which is exactly why I’m going to explain exactly what they are, what they stand for, and how that plays a part in our freedom and liberty. The Miranda Rights which can also be referred to as the Miranda Warning…

Words 465 - Pages 2

Plessy Vs. Ferguson Case: Brown V. Board Of Education

Brown v. Board of Education During the Brown vs board of education case the supreme court ruled (9-0) that the racial segregation within schools and public facilities violated the fourteenth Amendment. The fourteenth amendment guarantees that African Americans are complete citizens and have equal rights as any other citizen. So when the Plessy v. Ferguson case of 1896 ruled that African Americans were equal but separate it directly contradicted the already in place 14 amendment. The Brown v. Board…

Words 630 - Pages 3