Morality and Compromise Essay

Submitted By kyle012

Words: 415

Pages: 2

Open Document

When an individual is faced with the decision of choosing between sacrifice and compromise, one must keep in mind all the factors that benefit the individual, as well as society. The allegory of a sacrifice portrays the relinquishment of something at less than its presumed value. An individual executing sacrifice over compromise would recieve more positive benefits which include; praise in morality, benefits towards a relationship, and a positive affect of propriety towards the individual. The execution of a sacrifice over a compromise, in any given event, withstands a plethora of positive effects, in which the act of a compromise can't achieve. Sacrifice can help improve a relationship. According to the "Sacrifice Vs Compromise" article by Thea Theresa English, one who sacrifices something in order to help benefit the goals of another individual, gains trust and value to the point compromise can't achieve. Also according to the document, the allegory of compromise taking away from sacrifice holds a strong point. Choosing to make a compromise over a sacrifice which is, essentially taking actions into one's own hands, is selfish. The argument on behalf of partaking in a compromise, would induce the idea that a sacrifice is an aggressive route to take, which at times could be unecessary. Sacrifice might also be involved in negative connotation. One's sacrifices might lead to loss of integrity, family and friends for the benefits of fame, etc. These negative traits overall, still aren't overshadowed by a compromise's main fault, the actual prosperity of a compromise, which isn't lengthy. An essential 'overdose' of compromise can

Morality and Social Contract Essay

Explain and Illustrate the idea that morality is a conventional agreement for our own advantage and one problem with this. Do you often ask yourself, ‘why am I behaving in this civil way, when I could be gaining a lot more by behaving in a different way?’ Some claim that we are born with morals, and that it is a priori knowledge, however other philosophers argue that morality is in fact an agreement between humans. The idea that morality is a convential agreement for our own advantage is…

Words 720 - Pages 3

Social Theory Essay

Ariel Pimentel SOC-405 Dec 1st 2012 Social Theory I have learned throughout both Emily Durkeim and morality and in the Modern societies and Marx’s theories that the problems during the industrial revolution to the brief period of democracy after the French revolution in 1789. I have realized that Durkeim focuses on the group rather than the individual. And that Marx’s theories Political and Social problems played a huge role in the theories of Emile Durkeim and how he dealt with a lot of…

Words 470 - Pages 2

How Did Abraham Lincoln-Douglas Debates?

reference. Tackling slavery, war, and morality, each of these debates began with an intervention of one hour followed by 90 minutes of response and 30 minutes of response to the answer. But the Lincoln-Douglas debates were not presidential; The two men were fighting for the post of the senator of Illinois. Lincoln defended the idea that slavery is contrary to human rights and that as such, A democratic vote. The debates which led to the final version of the compromise of 1850 were among the most remarkable…

Words 497 - Pages 2

Sumner: Slavery in the United States and Slavery Essay

Brooks of South Carolina demonstrated the growing sectional conflict of the 1850s and foreshadowed the violence on the battlefield between armies of the North and the South. The Compromise of 1850 Conflict over slavery in the territories began in the1840s, and by the end of the decade, had risen to a crisis point. Compromise was still possible, however, because the second party system was built on nationally-based parties with a vested interest in maintaining peace. Additionally, though sectionalism…

Words 1711 - Pages 7

How Did Missouri Compromise Contribute To The Civil War

The Missouri Compromise was a short-sighted solution to the issue of slavery in the Louisiana territory. The compromise grew the argument of slavery and ultimately led to the breaking of the Union and the civil war. Through the Americans thoughts and ideas, along with the geographical separation, it is clear that the Missouri Compromise led to the south’s secession of the Union and the civil war. While Northerners argued that slavery should not migrate out West, in the new land acquired by America…

Words 665 - Pages 3

How Did The Enlightenment Affect The American Colonies

religion and the Enlightenment they would have to compromise and also respond to the consequences of this movement. During the Enlightenment many people were against rigid doctrine and even scoffed at conversion experiences. This would make it hard to embrace evangelical religion during the Enlightenment. Even with these difficulties John Tillotson, the archbishop of Canterbury, found a “polite and universal spirit”. He preached more on the morality of men rather than the radical doctrines; while…

Words 426 - Pages 2

Fugitive Slave Law Of 1850 Research Paper

The Fugitive Slave Law of 1850 emerged as a compromise between the opposing philosophies of Northern and Southern states regarding escaped slaves. Mandating the return of enslaved fugitives to their plantations and penalizing those who refused, the law aimed to alleviate the conflict, but instead, it intensified the states’ already discordant relationships due to their different interpretations of constitutional obligation. The Northern States, driven by strong abolitionist sentiments, resisted the…

Words 361 - Pages 2

Harry Gensler's Arguing Against Ima Relativist

Harry Gensler writes in defense of moral objectivity (also known as moral realism). He does this by creating a fictional account of a cultural relativist, Ima Relativist, and deconstructs her argument to show how it does not work. Gensler defends his view well, though more could be added to his argument. Gensler starts off his piece by offering up an account of a fictional cultural relativist, Ima Relativist. Ima argues that what the majority of a society approves of is morally good, objective truths…

Words 431 - Pages 2

Immanuel Kant and Emotions Essay

that actions must be universal for them to be classified as either moral or immoral. John Stuart Mill on the other hand was a British philosopher born in 1806 and died in 1873. Among his many developments is the utilitarianism theory that explains morality. Mill argues that the moral worth of an action is determined by its utility (pleasure or satisfaction derived from the action). Mill seems to suggest that our emotions and desires form a great basis on which we should judge our morals. For example…

Words 963 - Pages 4

Insanity Defense

I will first consider the pros and cons of both systems, then look into case studies for the two differing systems. For the jury, this system is strongest when dealing with cases with high emotional appeal and morality. The jury is more likely to sympathize with the convicts and act as a voice for the people, allowing for a fairer verdict in certain cases. The Amadou Diallo case illustrates this point, as if not for the jury, the issues plaguing the time would…

Words 1088 - Pages 5