I was relieved to read a paper that had concrete analyses and did not make it feel like I should be thinking a certain way. I believe that a solid article can present its main idea, yet still leave it up to the reader to decide its validity. Klosterman communicates his message simply and to the point. I felt that Klosterman kept a consistent flow throughout the article until the very end. Klosterman writes of people who prepare for the zombie apocalypse. The example of these people felt out of place, and was poorly connected to the main topic. I felt that it should have been developed more, or left out