NCLB Reform

Words: 825
Pages: 4
Open Document
Our education system is “Broken” and “Obsolete”. According to Diane Ravitch in her book Reign Of Error states that the U.S. Government had made education policies to improve the education system. However, the new education reforms haven’t improved the quality of education because these policies only focus on standardized test to check students are up to the level in their school grade. In the first hand the No Child Left Behind policy have brought positive effects such as check the performance of the students in basic subjects such as math, science and reading. However, in the other hand the use of standardized tests is making the schools to only focus on the test leaving behind other subjects that matters to help develop …show more content…
Yet, NCLB isn’t effective because they are other factors that affect the performance of the students such as social problems, poverty and minorities. Since the teachers are held responsible for their student learning, the “ Blame fall on their shoulders” (Ravitch, 3). Meaning that teachers are not expending time teaching how to solve the test therefore there is the low performance in the student. In addition, teachers are not well trained to deal with the external problems that affect the children …show more content…
In addition, they leave students in a limbo meaning that students should only focus on the classes that are being tested and the other subjects do not matter. I believe that standardized test only gives mixed result for the reason that no all the student are equal in the way of learning. In addition, some students are slow learned so for them to learn something takes more time while others don’t.

Another flaw of NCLB is “deprofessionalization of teachers” (Schul, 1). In other words, Schul believes that teachers are not being used to their full potential as educators because their method of teaching are inefficient and don’t help to get a good score in the test.Therefore, their school is penalized. In addition, the NCLB looks up for the students no to be left behind, but have lost the principle of teaching and leave behind the teachers because teachers must teach how to take a test to to meet up the standards and achieve the percentage of school grade to receive the
Show More

Related Documents: NCLB Reform

The No Child Left Behind Act: a Lemon Essay

No Child Left Behind is an educational reform enacted by President George W. Bush in 2001. The Act creates a set of national, as well as state testing standards in math, reading-comprehension, and history. All schools must bring all students above these standards by 2013. If they fail to meet certain standards for achieving these goals, the government can impose various sanctions on the school. While the act is a landmark move forward in education reform, its failings outweigh its merits. According…

Words 1074 - Pages 5

Case Study: ANAR Vs. NCLB

Ravitch begins by addressing how “accountability” and “choice” were at the heart of NCLB. What students should learn was left for each state. She initially saw potential in NCLB but with time she realized how curriculum and standard were not important and that its vision was not to improve the quality of education by learning but to “Measure, then punish or reward”. The curriculum is important for educating students by letting them think, debate and question. In the event of the history standards…

Words 336 - Pages 2

No Child Left Behind Essay

disadvantaged students. NCLB supports a standards-based education reform based on the premise that setting high standards and establishing measurable goals can improve individual outcomes in education. The Act requires states to develop assessments in basic skills. States must give these assessments to all students at select grade levels in order to receive federal school funding. The Act does not assert a national achievement standard; standards are set by each individual state. NCLB expanded the federal…

Words 832 - Pages 4

No Child Left Behind Policy Analysis Essays

role of the federal government in setting education policy increased significantly with the passage by Congress of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, a sweeping education reform law that revised the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965. "Federal policy has played a major role in supporting standards-based reform since the passage of the Improving America's Schools Act (IASA) of 1994. That law required states to establish challenging content and performance standards, implement assessments…hold…

Words 2952 - Pages 12

Essay about Eng010 FINAL

has passed and the U.S economy has changed drastically, yet, educational standards remain the same; an emphasis on reading and math are still being placed in priority by the government. The NCLB (No The Child Left Behind) act prioritized math and reading, demanding an overall increase in proficiency. “The NCLB did not even question the way today’s schools are organized and operated or whether they have not changed to keep up with the times” (Wolk 18). Children should be taught more diversely now,…

Words 1278 - Pages 6

Diane Ravich Reflection

in our country’s educational reform is significant in that it continues the debate about what is wrong with and best for American schools. Ravitch’s text commences with a detailed explanation about what she has learned regarding school reform. She first believed that testing, accountability, choice, and markets were the cornerstones to improve education in America and that was how she became a strong supporter of President George W. Bush’s No Child Left Behind (NCLB) program. However, after reviewing…

Words 578 - Pages 3

Argumentative Essay On No Child Left Behind

Are Children Still Being Left Behind? The No Child Left Behind Act or “NCLB” is the act that changed the way teachers did their jobs in all of America during 2002. It was an act stating that a child’s achievement should be measured. That the only way student’s success could be documented by testing. NCLB called for a series of multiple choice and short answer tests. Children were then placed in classes according to their scores on these exams. These tests were required in reading and math from 3rd-8th…

Words 1239 - Pages 5

What Is The Future Of Educational Finance

Federation of Teachers, 2011). One of the most significant issues with voucher programs is the fact that they do not have the same monitoring and regulations as public schools in order to obtain funding. “Perhaps the biggest critique of market-based reforms, such as school choice and performance based accountability is that they will further exacerbate inequalities in education” (Fusarelli and Young, 2011, p. 92). Not all program funding is distributed in the programs based on poverty. Parents of special…

Words 4080 - Pages 17

NCLB Finances

NCLB Finances Kay Wehner HSM/240 September 28, 2014 Betty Taylor NCLB Finances During the 2014 fiscal year, there was over $14 billion dollars that was devoted to Title I Grants to the Local Educational Agencies, which happens to be the largest No Child Left Behind program. Below is the 2005-2014 funding levels for the numerous programs that are selected in NCLB. NCLB Programs ($ millions) Program FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009* FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 Title I Grants to Local…

Words 645 - Pages 3

No Child Left Behind Research Paper

topic c. What will be covered 2. The NCLB Act d. How it came to be e. What was proposed f. How it has been enacted 3. The NCLB Act g. Arguments in favor of h. Arguments against 4. Statistics i. How the NCLB Act has had a positive impact on education j. How the NCLB Act has had a negative impact on education 5. Proposal k. Proposals from different resources on how to change the NCLB Act l. The implications of such change…

Words 3558 - Pages 15