The concept of narrative interviewing has always been a notion I have found particularly daunting due to its reliance on effectual rapport building, adequate positioning of oneself as a therapist or practitioner, and one’s ability to identify new narratives and externalising factors (Carey & Russell, 2002, 2003; Morgan, 2002). Through breaking these issues down, I have been able to identify my specific concerns when engaging in narrative interviews and compensate through additional research. One of the key challenges that has arisen through this process is the necessity to act as a conduit for conversation rather than offer advice or interject one’s own knowledge (Morgan, 2002). The ability to empower the client …show more content…
Although a therapy recognised and used in social work practice, the way in which theories such as strengths, empowerment and solutions theory can be identified is clearly evident and beneficial. Strengths perspective and empowerment theory share several consistencies in that they focus on the understanding that all individuals possess strengths, abilities, and means of empowering themselves, they act with resilience in the face of adversity, and they assume the role of expert in their own life (Healy, 2014). These are clear intentions and guidelines exhibited in the course of narrative therapy. Through narrative therapy, practitioners are able to monopolise on the strengths of the individual and entrust in them the capacity to navigate and dictate their own choices as the position of authority within their own life (Morgan, 2002). Similarly, solutions theory stipulates that individuals already possess the tools and skills needed to resolve issues. It is the responsibility of the practitioner to aid in uncovering these skills and empower clients to utilise them (Healy, 2014). Narrative therapy engages in solutions theory as it focuses on the client’s abilities as well as the recognition that solutions rather than problems remain the focus of action (Morgan,