Never Let Me Go

Words: 1082
Pages: 5

It is interesting to think of technological advancements as being borne out of our species insatiable curiosity which, in numerous ways is largely responsible for our evolutionary success. In the case of reproductive cloning, as presented in Never Let Me Go, I wonder if it is even possible to, as a collective whole, even stop or limit the possibility of that story becoming part of our reality. It is embedded deep in our nature to explore and experiment, to try and improve upon that which could already be called perfect. It is this relentless desire to survive as well as our curiosity which gives some pause. Are we even able to control technology as it were? Once a discovery has been made and knowledge of some form has been created, is it possible …show more content…
In a study entitled "Ethical Issues in Stem Cell Research" the authors Bernard Lo and Lindsey Parham expound "Some people, however, believe that an embryo is a person with the same moral status as an adult or a live-born child. As a matter of religious faith and moral conviction, they believe that "human life begins at conception" and that an embryo is, therefore, a person. According to this view, an embryo has interests and rights that must be respected. From this perspective, taking a blastocyst and removing the inner cell mass to derive an embryonic stem cell line is tantamount to murder" (Lo). While this argument may be hard to make consistently against the use of stem cell research for vital health concerns, it brings an important element to the discussion of ethics regarding technology and scientific advancement. It is vital that there be disagreement in the debate about the responsible use of technology. For without disagreement there is only consent and not any questioning of "should" we. What would the Christian response be to the cloning and use of clones for organ donation as put forth in "Never Let Me Go" would