Neville Chamberlain Essay

Submitted By kurtisgilley
Words: 513
Pages: 3
Open Document
Neville Chamberlain
Neville Chamberlain was Britain’s Prime Minister from May 1937 through May of 1940. Chamberlain was elected as Prime Minister upon the retirement of Stanley Baldwin, Britain’s former Prime Minister. Chamberlain was a very conservative leader for Britain, and wanted to avoid war at all costs. This was because he felt there was more of a threat coming from the Japanese and the Italians than there was from Germany. His primary goal was to avoid any premature conflict with any nation in order to build up his military and conserve resources in order to defend against an attack from the Italians or the Japanese. Chamberlain was by no means the aggressor in the beginning years of World War II because like many other nations, he continued to hold the mindset that strong defensive lines would prove to win against its aggressors, as was the case during the Great War. Chamberlain was often regarded as not being worthy enough to hold the position of Britain’s Prime Minister because of his lack of attention and aggression towards Hitler and his movement. As stated above Chamberlain wanted to avoid any premature conflicts at all costs while he built up his military. By doing so he essentially let Hitler walk all over him and continually break the Treaty of Versailles without receiving any punitive measures taken against him. Anytime Hitler would break the Treaty, Chamberlain would meet with Hitler and give in to his demands. What chamberlain was doing was drawling a line in the dirt and instructing Hitler not to cross it, but as soon as Hitler would cross that line, Chamberlain would draw yet another further into neutral territory. Each time this would happen Chamberlain would meet with Hitler, and upon leaving Chamberlain would be convinced that Hitler would not advance anymore. Chamberlain would then return to Britain and ensure the government and people of Britain that Hitler’s movement has stopped. On Chamberlains final trip to meet with Hitler during the Munich Conference, which resulted in the Munich Pact, Hitler gave
Show More

Related Documents: Neville Chamberlain Essay

World War Ii and Neville Chamberlain Essay

Interviewer: Hello and good morning. Today we have a very special guest Neville chamberlain and we are going to be talking about if Britain is going to be declaring war on Germany and what Neville chamberlain and the government are going to do about it. Neville chamberlain: well we have just come out of a war in terms of the country and I don’t think us as a country or Europe is ready for another one. Interviewer: it total agree with you and understand what you’re saying but isn’t Hitler readying…

Words 454 - Pages 2

Essay about World War Ii and Neville Chamberlain

Essay Question: “The failure of the Norway campaign was the most significant cause of Neville Chamberlain’s resignation in may 1940”. How far do you agree? (25 marks) Neville Chamberlain became prime minister of Great Britain on the 28th of May 1937, just 3 years later on the 10th of May 1940, Chamberlain resigned. The out break of the war was a personal disaster for Chamberlain, for over two years he had pursued a policy of accommodation with Germany over her territorial claims with remarkable…

Words 1943 - Pages 8

British Appeasement

War Two was the only reasonable response to the diplomatic crises occurring in Europe. After decades of criticism and judgment it is clear that Neville Chamberlain’s approach to dealing with Adolf Hitler was the only way that made a global conflict avoidable. This paper will argue that appeasement had certain advantages that were important in assisting Neville Chamberlain’s cause. One way that appease was useful in this situation was the neutralizing of nations considered as threats. Nations such as…

Words 1681 - Pages 7

Essay on Appeasement Adolf Hitler

We can see in Source A that Neville Chamberlain was in favour of the appeasement and settled that it was the only viable route. Neville Chamberlain exclaims in a radio broadcast, “Armed conflict between nations is a nightmare to me” when Chamberlain stated this he implied that appeasement was the only option to avoid war. Neville Chamberlain showed that he was willing to allow Hitler increase his territory in order to escape from another war. The reason that Neville wished to avoid war is due to…

Words 694 - Pages 3

How Did Hitler Shaped The Munich Agreement?

Mussolini, French Premier Edouard Daladier, and British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain signed the Munich Agreement, which sealed the fate of Czechoslovakia, and virtually handing it over to Germany in the name of peace. At the time of the meeting, Chamberlain declared that peace had been reached with Germany. His actions were popular in Britain because the British people thought war with Germany had been avoided. Chamberlain seem to have underestimated Hitler’s ambitions. In March 1939, Hitler…

Words 799 - Pages 4

Essay on Causes Of World War II

Another long­term cause of WWII were the ineffective appeasement policies of British Neville Chamberlain who had followed in the logic of Woodrow Wilson that Germany might be given a chance to recover or that it could join mature negotiations. When Hitler had taken power, though, Germany could not be trusted and many advisors to Chamberlain made that case. Hitler had taken the Rhineland in 1936 and Austria with Anschluss in 1938. Then came Czechoslovakia and Poland. Chamberlain, nevertheless, addressed all of Britain in a 1939 speech to say…

Words 1286 - Pages 6

History: World War Ii and Munich Agreement Essay

Appeasement Policy Giving into someone provide their demands are seen as reasonable During the 1930's many politicians in Britain and France came to see that the terms of the treaty of versailles were placed Hitlers actions were seen as reasonable and understandable Western democracies gave into Germany, Japan and Italy in order to satisfy them and prevent war. Battle of Britain Winston Churchill says that Britain will not negotiate for peace. Hitler plans Operation Sea Lion, the invasion…

Words 806 - Pages 4

Causes Of Appeasement

military. During the interwar period of 1938 Hitler and Britain's prime minister Neville Chamberlain met at the house of commons to debate the Munich agreement, this agreement leads to appeasement which at the time seemed like an excellent idea but ended up causing more harm than good. Appeasement was not a solution to the war instead it was a contributing factor to the cause of the war. Therefore many felt that if “Chamberlains Stood firm… Hitler would have climbed down”.…

Words 266 - Pages 2

Essay about hannahs files

Hannah Burkart Social Studies Period 02 12/14/13 WWI was a war that happened for many reasons but started mainly from mistrust and jealousy. In the end Germany had been the one to blame for the entire war, and eventually led to WWII. How this started was that in the end of WWI, they held a meeting with America, France, Britain, and Italy. They were discussing who to put the blame on for the war and who would be facing the consequences. In the end, all of the countries at the conference decided…

Words 1025 - Pages 5

Was Appeasement Justified Research Paper

is an issue that raises a great deal of discussion and many have diverse opinions about how this effected history. For instance, countless historians have gone back and forth in conflict debating on whether this was an appropriate move for Neville Chamberlain to make back before World War ll. Even though appeasement wasn’t the prime decision, for it left Britain in weakness, appeasement was justified because there was no other approach, appeasement was the only way, and it was the mature way to…

Words 449 - Pages 2