Nicholas Biddle And The Bank Of The United States

Submitted By hbg97
Words: 864
Pages: 4
Open Document
Nicholas Biddle and The Bank of the United States
President Andrew Jackson had always opposed the use of paper money and more importantly, set out to destroy the existence of the national bank. He strongly believed that having a national bank would jeopardize the political rights and influence of the common man. However, after successfully removing the bank, Jackson not only jeopardized the economic stability of the country, but he also divided it into two political parties, the Whigs and Democrats, causing political disunity. He opposed
Nicholas Biddle’s proposal to keep the national bank, which severely affected the United States by killing its economy.
1. How did Jackson or his policies affect the life of Nicholas Biddle?
Jackson and his policies affected the life of Nicholas Biddle dramatically. Jackson wanted to get rid of the Bank of the United
States because he thought the bank had too much power over the economy. Jackson opposed the usage of paper money because he preferred gold and silver currency instead. Jackson disagreed about giving the bank a new charter. He didn’t listen to the supreme court and he was the one who caused inflation. He believed that a new charter was unconstitutional. The House of
Representatives voted on it and they had decided to put in a new charter but Jackson vetoed the bill. In his second term, Jackson stopped depositing federal money in the national banks. He decided to put the money in the state banks instead. Nicholas
Biddle demanded people to repay their loans immediately so he could try to save the national bank.
Jackson’s decision in depositing money in state banks didn’t help the economy because after removing funds from the national bank and placing them in state banks, he ended up causing high inflation due to state banks printing exorbitant amounts of currency. This ended up contributing to the factors that led to the Panic of 1837.
2. In what way did Nicholas Biddle specifically interact with Jackson or his policies?
The interactions between Jackson and Biddle were a series of unspoken arguments and actions regarding the legitimacy of the
Second Bank. Although Jackson and Biddle never interacted in person, Jackson had clearly attempted to destroy Biddle’s plans for the Second Bank with yearly criticized messages towards him and his foundation. According to Jackson, the bank was dangerous to the liberties of the people, and would destroy the political parties by giving out loans to the politicians. Throughout his presidency, Jackson, in his second term, had stopped giving out financial support to the Bank, which perpetuated Biddle to fully go out and save the bank from financial ruins. Biddle had demanded that borrowers return and pay back the loans taken from the bank, and this lead to struggling businesses without the support of the bank and many had lost their jobs. Biddle had put the blame upon President Jackson for the financial crisis and took no responsibility towards it.
Nicholas Biddle tried to get the national bank back up by asking the governor of Pennsylvania to make a speech about supporting the bank. In order for the governor to do so, he asked for $300,000 in return. When Biddle didn’t give the money to the governor, he was furious. So instead of supporting the national bank, he opposed it. Also, the governor of
Show More

Related Documents: Nicholas Biddle And The Bank Of The United States

Analysis Of Noel Pearson's Speech An Australian History For Us All

Noel Pearson’s speech “An Australian History for us All”, explores the divides and the disparities that exist between the Aboriginal and non-aboriginal people in our society that prevent us as a state from achieving reconciliation, unity and a national identity. Pearson through rhetoric persuades the audience that there are questions that need to be asked concerning the accuracy of Australian history. Through judicial rhetoric Pearson Highlights the past and present injustices suffered by the Indigenous…

Words 408 - Pages 2

Compare And Contrast Day Of Infamy And The Gettysburg Address

can pull a country apart or bring it together. Some actions would be speeches. These three famous speeches makes up most of american history as the most famous speeches in american history and all brought America together for a common cause. These speeches are “The gettysburg Address” by Abraham Lincoln, “Day of Infamy” by Franklin D. Roosevelt, and George Bush’s speech on 9/11. In “The Gettysburg Address” was given in 1863, and was delivered at Gettysburg after the battle of Gettysburg during…

Words 576 - Pages 3

A Rhetorical Analysis Of Ted Kennedy's Speech

his way to the podium to speak. After suffering from brain cancer and having a recent brain surgery the Senator gave his speech in the Pepsi Center located in Denver Monday, Aug. 25, 2008. Chairman of the Democratic National Committee Howard Dean stated, “Ted Kennedy is known as the ‘Lion of the Senate’ and today he showed us why.” As the longest running Senator in American history from 1962 to 2009 walked towards the podium the cheering only increased. The Democratic National Convention was packed…

Words 320 - Pages 2

Rhetorical Analysis Of I Have A Dream

talks about how Negro slaves were never treated fairly and with the rights that we all have as people. He risked his life by making an emotional speech in front of the people. A place where there were people with different color skin that didn't get the respect they deserved. His speech explains the hardships that black people had to go through. The speech that he gave on August 23, 1963 showed a lot of integrity to all the people of his same color. He took the chance of making a difference in life…

Words 604 - Pages 3

Elie Wiesel Research Paper

converted prison in Brandenburg, Germany. She was undressed, examined, and gassed in a shower room” (www.ushmm.org) (U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum). Literature helps us understand what the victims and survivors went through. It also helps us understand how much it impacted human lives. The Holocaust was a horrific event in world's history. To forget about it, is to insult the victims even more than they already were. We remember the Holocaust to help prevent genocide from happening again. Indifference…

Words 846 - Pages 4

Analyzing Barack Obama's Speech

It is a speech when the up coming president shows us that they are ready to run the country the right way. Even though every president has given one, Barack Obama has given the best one. He introduces us to the meaning of the word ‘we’. When he gave his speech he included the problems that he could possibly fix. I like this especially because he didn’t say he will fix it he said he might be able to fix it. When he says he might, we already know that he probably won’t do it. What makes us vote for…

Words 382 - Pages 2

Similarities Between Jefferson And Patrick Henry

The Declaration of Independence is quite possibly the most important document in the US history it declares the freedom from the Tyrannical ruler King George III of England. Jefferson starts out the famous document immediately with the demand that the US be free of England's rule. He then continues with the morale truths the US lives by “all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are…

Words 668 - Pages 3

Sleuthing The Alamo Analysis

Political Science Major. History to me is very important. It is important because History affects everyone in the past and present. I believe that Politics and History go together hand in hand because they both depend on each other. I have a great respect for History and Political Science. So with that, I have never typed a three-page essay for any class so please bear with me as I answer Question #1. As we read in the first chapter James Crisp reads Sam Houston’s speech to the soldiers at Refugio…

Words 1245 - Pages 5

Essay On 1st Amendment

The 1st Amendment of the Bill Of Rights is an integral part of U.S history. First of all, what is the 1st Amendment? It states that all citizens of the United States of America are entitled to the freedom of speech, freedom of religion, freedom of the press, and the freedom to protest and petition the government. This means that the government cannot establish a national religion that we must worship, the government cannot arrest or punish people who criticize high-government officials, and the government…

Words 614 - Pages 3

Essay on Mr Harry Eldridge

The concepts raised in Paul Keating’s 1993 eulogy reaffirms this position. The nature of his speech stems from the discovery of an unidentifiable Australian who tragically died during the course World War 1. Keating attempts to battle the issue of creating a tangible identity for the soldier for all Australian’s to mourn. He begins his deeply moving eulogy with an anaphora, stating “we do not know”, leading is to ironically respect the soldier even though know nothing about him, only that he represents…

Words 749 - Pages 3