Theoretically speaking, Nicholas Sparks embraces the statues of critics such as Victor Shklovsky and Wolfgang Iser. Since sparks comes close to writing cliché, and yet he is able to subvert it at the same time, he embarks on Shklovsky’s process of “defmailiarization” (Lodge 21). Shklovsky said, “ if one remembers the sensations of holding a pen or speaking in a foreign language for the first time and compares that with his feeling at performing the action for the ten thousandth time, he will agree.” This particular maxim applies directly to a writer like Sparks. How is it that Sparks rises above mediocrity and reaches acclaim with the general public? In Shklovsky’s terms, Sparks’ success lies in his ability to “defamiliarize” the reader from habitual topics of discussion. Sparks is well aware of his surroundings in literature and embraces while still reforming the very clichés that define his genre. Nicholas is able to captivate the reader by constantly controlling and reformatting their expectations; so the story is never entirely predictable. It enforces engagement, Sparks upbringing and his life as a faithful catholic, influences his writing of several levels. Motifs of life versus death and miraculous events are located in each of his novels. No matter the content of his works; being an author, he always