No-Play Rule

Words: 613
Pages: 3

“More than 50% of all high school students play [sports]” (“Who Deserves to Play?” 158). That’s over half of all kids in high school who are at risk of being taken out of sports unfairly and who fear making a single mistake in their learning. It’s all thanks to the No-Pass-No-Play rule. Many kids fail a class, all for different reasons. Should they really all be taken out of their beloved sports, away from their friends, and have their opportunities, exercise, and the learning of important life lessons taken away from them? All over the country kids are being kicked out of sports because this rule that applies to only a small amount of students that are slacking off academics due to sports. These children are being unjustly prosecuted and stereotyped, …show more content…
In the expert 21 textbook, one kid tells of a few instances in his school where kids are unfairly taken out of sports because they failed a single class, and not because they were slacking off! For instance one case was about an immigrant who was failing English. “...playing soccer helps him learn English skills because he picks up the language from his teammates” (“New Rules Unfair to Student Athletes” 161). Does he deserve to get kicked off the team? No! Because of this and many other reasons, students with failing grades should still be allowed to play sports in school. Not only are people being unfairly prosecuted, but it is also hurting their academic life, taking away their chances to have fun and exercise and learn valuable life lessons, and it is completely separate from sports and the classroom; if you need help, get a tutor, talk to the teacher, etc. There are plenty of ways to get academic support besides taking away sports. So what’s the point? The point is that taking students out of sports because of academics often does more harm than