Non violence Essay

Submitted By Manuela-Montoya
Words: 746
Pages: 3
Open Document
Manuela Montoya Alzate
Grammar
November 5, 2014
Writing #4 (first draft)
(Research Argument)

Human Nature vs. Non Violence

In history of humanity more conflicts have been resolved with violence. The human nature, as the way people behaves in community, is aggressive by itself, and it had to be the case for survival in past ages. Human evolution is understood as the change people have experienced since the beginning of humanity in the prehistory until modern societies. Also it has had an impact on the behavior; it takes a long time to evolve, that is the reason why aggressive manners remains in humans as a heritage from their ancestors. According to the book Apes And The Origins Of Human Violence, the men who were more aggressive in evolutionary past, could be more biologically successful (Wrangham, 1997). But with the human evolution, humans have challenged their biological aggressive instinct to become less violent and resolve issues peacefully, showing that the nonviolence has become an effective method of change.
On the other hand, evolution does not happen overnight; as it is said in the article “Are Humans Hard-Wired to Behave Aggressively?” waiting for evolution to breed out our bad traits can take a long time. There have been some improvements among natural evolution, as the ones that have been observed in Borbono Monkeys, who have split from their aggressive chimpanzee cousins 2.5 million years ago and only were able to create lovely societies ten-thousand years ago (Wylie, 2003). So, humans would need an efficient method but waiting for evolution to become peaceful.
In that sense, when humans have faced off their nature and have been able to create peaceful movements, they have proved how through peaceful reconciliation it is possible to achieve an objective and resolve a conflict. As it was shown in the video A Force More Powerful: A Century of Nonviolence Conflict, it was not easy to threaten their contenders with peace, without doing tests to themselves first. They had to study how to respond to violence in a different way in order to internalize the reaction (York, 1999). However, they have shown to the world that it might be a better option, one that can reduce the number of deaths and bloodshed and still resolve the struggle.
Once again, to escape out of violent human instinct is needed even after war, which is not an easy task, but it could be done. In the history of humankind the majority of conflicts have been solved in a war, leaving to the countries involved not only death, but to big problems preparing the population for the transition to peace. As it is indicated in the article “Healing Lessons From Another War-Torn Society-Mozambique”, a country that had a war that took sixteen million of citizen’s life, numerous outrages were committed, but managed to return to peace rapidly. That was possible due to strong cultural resources for peacemaking and conflict resolution, which is another example how non-violent methods are more effective in society, how it allows people to get away from endless cycles of violence (Cobban, 2003).
As it has
Show More

Related Documents: Non violence Essay

Gandhi Non Violence Movement

Were there any debates where the non-violence protests began? Many people credit Martin Luther King Jr., and Nelson Mandela. Little do people know Mahatma Gandhi was one of the first men to get a society to non-violently protest. He was able to persuade most of a country to protest without violence. Gandhi was an impactful figure who benefited society by inspiring people to non-violently protest, impacting the people of India by freeing them from British law, and promoting religion throughout…

Words 1208 - Pages 5

The Pros And Cons Of Non-Violence

Non-violence is restraint from fighting, which can include the use of words or fists to intentionally cause harm. Jesus interprets, "Do not set yourself against the man who wrongs you. If someone slaps you on the right cheek, turn and offer him your left." Taken from "The Sayings of Jesus", he explains what should be done when you are angered as an alternative to lashing out with ferocity. Pacifism is portrayed by walking away from a fight or dispute even when there is a great urge to avenge you…

Words 515 - Pages 3

Non Violence Speech Critique

1. The specific purpose of this speech is to reinforce the idea of non-violence. It is his main purpose of his speech and can be seen in his multiple references to needing non-violence. 2. The structure of the speech impacts the meaning in different ways based on the part of the speech that he is at. At the beginning of the speech he talks about the problems that the African Americans face. He tells them the background and what they have done to get to this point already. He says “You students…

Words 1466 - Pages 6

Cesar Chavez Non Violence

Moreover, Chavez posits logical hypotheticals to argue that violence results in more negative resulting effects compared to nonviolence. For instance, in paragraph 4, Chavez writes a clear-cut statement detailing the two hypothetical effects of resorting to violence when addressing injustice. He argues that violence may either escalate, culminating in violence on both sides or result in the demoralization of the…

Words 984 - Pages 4

Why Do African Americans Choose Violence Or Non-Violence?

is that most African American chose violence over non-violent meaning of protest because violence can reveal manhood but non-violence does not; however, non-violence finally got faith from both African American and White American because it contains the concept of hope that violence does not have. Wendt supports his argument by analyzing how gender norms were identified during the civil rights era. Wendt finds out that “ The gendered nature of southern violence carried special significance for black…

Words 407 - Pages 2

Essay On Non Violence Resistance Movement

Non-violence resistance movements have a positive and negative effect on free society as demonstrated by Martin Luther King Jr. and Emitt Till. People may think non-violence may only be positive or only negative. In my opinion it's both because back then many white people were very cruel and liked the law of being treated differently when there wasn't a good reason for it because everyone at the end are all human beings. Many people were able to say what they think and what they want to…

Words 492 - Pages 2

How Did Gandhi Use Non Violence

Gandhi once said, "Non-violence is the greatest force at the disposal of mankind. It is mightier than the mightiest weapon of destruction devised by the ingenuity of man." Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi uses nonviolent measures to speak his voice. and destruction comes from those with little patience and understanding. Gandhi believed nonviolence was a force stronger than any other to counter any obstacle that comes your way; he thought of it as fighting for justice by not fighting at all. Man can create…

Words 1165 - Pages 5

Non-Violence, Nonviolent Movements, By Cesar Chavez

Cesar Chavez, a civil rights leader and labor union organizer for farmers, believes nonviolence creates a bigger impact than violence. In his short except, Chavez utilizes pathos, contrasting ideas, and historical references to promote nonviolent movements for change. Firstly, Chavez evokes grief from the reader through pathos. While explaining the negatives to violence, Chavez continues even further with “…the struggle would become a mechanical thing. When you lose your sense of life and justice…

Words 631 - Pages 3

Assess The Difference Between Non-Violence And Nonviolent Resistance

Violence and nonviolence each have their place, but in every situation there is always one best option. When it comes to protest, nonviolence is generally the best option. Non-violent resistance is superior when looked at from the standpoints of effectiveness, morality, and societal consequences. Non-violent protest is generally more effective than violent resistance. For example, after the 1955 arrest of Rosa Parks for refusing to give up her bus seat to a white man, civil rights leaders in Montgomery…

Words 591 - Pages 3

From Non Violence To Black Power Thomas Merton Summary

There is no doubt Thomas Merton was an advocate for non-violence. In many of his books, essays, and journals, Merton spends quite some time describing the effects of violence and how non-violence can lead to dialogue. This to Merton is a more effective way of solving issues. Merton was also a man of understanding. He tried to look at issues from both sides, and tried to understand each person’s logic. During the Civil Rights Movement, Merton began to write more on racial injustice. This led him to…

Words 1322 - Pages 6