Chapter 2 2) Moral absolutism is a view that says you need not hold that the objective principles are rigid rules that have no exceptions or, that they must be applied in exactly the same way in every culture and situation. Objectivism is the view that some moral principles are valid for everyone. Moral absolutism is not needed through objectivism. 4) Omotivism is the view that moral utterances are neither true nor false but are expressions of emotions or attitudes. Objectivism believes that they are moral priniciples that are valid for everyone, while omotivism believes that everyone holds their very own moral principles, and that while they may be similar, no one will hold the same moral princibles. 6) Moral subjectivism is stating that in each of our own opinion and moral judgments, that we are not wrong. According to subjective relativism each person is incapable of being in error. Each of us is morally infallible. If we approve of an action then that action is morally right. 8) Everyone’s judgments about right and wrong differ from culture to culture. If people’s judgments about right and wrong differ, then right and wrong are relative to culture, and there are no moral principles. This shows that right and wrong are relative to culture, and that there are no objective moral principles. 10) A connection between cultural relevance and tolerance is completely necessary. Tolerance seems a supreme virtue, and cultural relativism appears to