DDS determined the claimant is disabled at step 5 of sequential evaluation, without first completing step 4. A review of the case file shows there is insufficient vocational evidence to make a vocational decision.
CASE DISCUSSION & POLICY ANALYSIS (INCLUDING SPECIFIC REFERENCES)
This 54 year old is filing a Concurrent claim alleging disability due to multiple medical impairments including blindness in the right eye.
The evidence in file reasonably supports the DDS’ RFC, addition, due to decreased…
Words 754 - Pages 4