The Theoretical Perspective Of Realism And Exploring The Iranian Nuclear Issue

Submitted By geisela80
Words: 950
Pages: 4
Open Document
The Theoretical perspective of realism and discussing the Iranian nuclear issue is a perfect design into examining persuasive diplomatic tools and ways for the government of Iran to abandon the nuclear weapons program. It is said the Rrealistm Theoretical theoretical perspective has dominated thinking about iInternational politicscies over a millennia, realists claim to view the world as it ought to be. “Realists tend to hold pessimistic views on the likelihood of the transformation of the current world into a more peaceful one, emphasizing the struggle for power among political units each acting in a rational, unitary manner to advance their interest” (Viotti, 2009Paul R. International relations and world politics : security, economy, identity / Paul R. Viotti, Mark V. Kauppi.)

It is clear that there cannot be a nuclear Iran not in the tTwenty fFirst cCentury., there has to be an increase of politics among states this must include all Arab nations or actors who feel the same as the international community that it is not in the world’s best interest for a nuclear Iran to exist. Throughout the end of the twentieth century and into the new millennia Iran has made many attempts in pursing its nuclear ambitions and has yet come to the international table for an effective nuclear diplomacy.

In order to prevent Iran from becoming a nuclear state is in no way shape or form a military answer, the use of the military would be catastrophic on the international community and would cause a collapse of most Mmiddle Eeastern nations; the political solution which is in effect today would be the actions of financial sanctions preventing the country of Iran from operating in such a high financial capacity. These unilateral economic sanctions are designed to put a restraint on the government of Iran not initially meant to affect the people of Iran.

The business of freezing assets and or monies in foreign banks slows the progress of the Iranian want of a nNuclear program hence it slows the act of acquiring not the government's ambition. A realist outlook to the issue in my opinion of sanctions is basically the step of bilateral talks to increase pressure in reference to the politics of this issue.

These bilateral talks have to conduct in such a manner that all key players or actors in the international community are vigoursly involved actors such as Russia and China without the support of these countries whose support is vital unilateral sanctions would not work to their full effect. Even though there has been increased call for a quick military strike on known Iranian nuclear facilities realism tells us that a military strike of any kind would not be a quick answer .

It is my opinion that any military strike would further destabilize the Middle East , all talks bilateral and or unilateral would cease and effective diplomacy would be lost. The UN Ssecurity Ccouncil of the United States and other world leader plus Germany better known as P5+1 are specifically designed for all power to include Iran to come together for talks concerning nuclear diplomacy as of yet these talks have been in stale mate due to commitment issues of the international community and so called use of delaying tactics by Tehran.

To future examine the reasoning’s behind Tehran inability to cooperate with the international community you would have to learn the results and findings of the international nuclear watchdog better known as the IAEA which has noted that the country of Iran has been uncooperative on many fronts pertaining to the issue of their nuclear wants as a country and fears of there being a military dimension to its nuclear program. A realist principle can be drawn into that statement referencing Iran’s
Show More

Related Documents: The Theoretical Perspective Of Realism And Exploring The Iranian Nuclear Issue

Iran Nuclear Program

Iran and its nuclear program The steady rise of nuclear weapons in the global community is a concern to all the worlds’ people. Iran has been in pursuit of nuclear energy sustainability for years, and with this an opportunity to produce a nuclear warhead. The theory that allowing Iran to hold nuclear weapon will create a peace in the region is absurd, considering the both Iran and Israel will never bomb each other. Iran’s history with other global powers will help disclose the future and why they…

Words 4164 - Pages 17

Essay about Nuclear Iran Debate

Iran The debate over Iran and its nuclear capabilities fuel discussions challenging the effectiveness of deterrence. While some argue that continuing to implement serious sanctions will stop Iran from developing a nuclear weapon, others argue that nothing will stop the determined country from doing so. Iran has been suffering from the effects of such harsh sanctions for years and has yet to abandon its pursuit of nuclear power. Many believe these sanctions actually motivate the Islamic Republic…

Words 1278 - Pages 6

Pros And Cons Of The Iran Nuclear Deal

The international community will surely support the deal in the same ways Americans will. Simply put, the Iran Nuclear Deal handles the current state of affairs in a way which has a high reward (15+ years until Iran’s breakout time) and a low risk (any unlikely rebellion can be put down quickly by the larger and more advanced American forces). If rejected the other countries of P5+1 will feel alienated. Not wanting to feel that isolation after the hard work they put into the deal, all countries involved…

Words 571 - Pages 3

Pros And Cons Of The Iran Nuclear Deal

The Iran Nuclear Deal, a preeminent paradigm of collegial diplomacy After twenty tactfully long arduous months of negotiations, vitriolic debates, congressional lobbying, and private briefings, at last, the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) put together by the P5+ nations ( China, USA, Germany, United Kingdom, France) under the leadership of the U.S. have finally reached a comprehensible agreement—The Iran Nuclear Deal. From an American perspective, this is a breakthrough that has been sought…

Words 1153 - Pages 5

9/11: The Iran Nuclear Nightmare

A Nuclear Nightmare As the international political scene has grown increasingly complicated over the last 50 years, there have been few constants. One constant has been the United States’ perpetual involvement in the pursuit of global stability and safety. While some may question our specific interventionist policies, the fact remains that the United States occupies the position of mediator of the world. However, a new threat in the form of the Iran Nuclear Deal is looming, and The United Stated…

Words 1073 - Pages 5

Essay on Analysis of Iranian Nuclear Weapons Research

leaders of Iran in Kazakhstan to attempt to persuade them to curtail it’s nuclear weapons ambitions (Herszenhorn, Negotiators Find in Kazakhstan the Perfect Place to Disagree 2013) Two days later, Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad announced on national television, “Iran has already become a nuclear country and no one is capable of stealing this title.” Iran maintains that its nuclear pursuits are for energy and medical purposes while members of the Security Council accuse it of seeking nuclear weapons…

Words 1352 - Pages 6

Iran Israel Relations Essay

Iran and Israel: Is war inevitable? Why are there tensions between Iran and Israel? By: Ryan Greenspoon, JEHIT-01 2 The Iranian-Israeli conflict is one of the most significant conflicts currently raging in the Middle East. Relations between Iran and Israel were civil for a long period of time up until 1979 when Muslim extremists overthrew the leader of Iran, Shah, Mohammad Reza Pahlavi. (“Iran-Israel Relations”) The extremists led by Ayatollah Khomeini declared Israel “an enemy of Islam”…

Words 1050 - Pages 5

Iran Joint Plan

Iran Nuclear Deal: Joint Plan of Action The goal of the Joint Plan of Action is to reach a joint agreement and long-term complete solution that would confirm Iran’s nuclear program is absolutely peaceful. The thorough solution would enable Iran to fully enjoy its right to nuclear energy for peaceful purposes under the relevant articles of the NPT in compliance with its commitments. The complete solution would involve equally defined enrichment programs with practical limits and clarity measures to…

Words 1489 - Pages 6

United Nations Security Council Resolution 1696 Essay

International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) reports of the potential for undeclared nuclear material or activities in Iran. The June 2006 IAEA Director General report indicated “the Agency is unable to make progress in its efforts to provide assurance about the absence of undeclared nuclear material and activities in Iran. After more than three years of Agency efforts to seek clarity about all aspects of Iran’s nuclear program, the existing gaps in knowledge continue to be a matter of concern (International…

Words 1732 - Pages 7

Nuclear Proliferation Essay

Nuclear Proliferation Only twice in the Earth’s history has man been witness to the tremendous and awful power of nuclear bombs dropped in populated areas. The two bombs dropped in Japan effectively ended the Pacific’s engagement in World War II, but the age of nuclear threats was just beginning. Though the first to discover and test the technology, the United States certainly wasn’t the last. Unilateral military force by the US is justified to prevent nuclear proliferation for the following reasons:…

Words 798 - Pages 4